Harry Reid on Life Support
We all hope for a fast and complete recovery for South Dakota's Senator Tim Johnson and for the very best for him and his family.
However, one can't help notice all the intense scrambling by Democrat Senate Majority Leader Hary Reid to make sure everyone knows that he's (still) in charge and intends to remain that way- no matter what.
Sen. Reid and other Democrats are quick to point out that previous members of the House and Senate have continued to remain in office for years while totally unable to perform their duties (medically speaking) indicating Democrats have no intention of giving up control of the Senate if Senator Johnson is unable to work.
One must conclude then, if Terri Schiavo had been a sitting Democrat Senator with the balance of power at stake, she would be alive today and receiving the best therapy known to mankind.
Democrats would be praising her daily improvements ("she looks good") and calling for emergency embryonic stem cell research to heal her in time to resume her duties.
Instead, we heard a completely different story from Harry Reid and Democrats about Terri's "rights", which they claimed included being starved to death by her ex-husband.
But, since Terri wasn't vital to Democrat control and balance of power, they instead used her as a media weapon to proclaim it was Republicans who were overstepping their bounds by trying to save her life... a life not worth living or saving according to Democrats.
Apparently, only Democrat politicians deserve that kind of committed life-support.
-red
Labels: democrat, hypocricy, life support, sad
posted by RD at 3:39 PM
AOL Sports Hottest Athlete
26 Comments:
hey , your thoughts are interesting .
I blog about worklife balanace , mumbai marathon & finding great place to work at ; http://www.vgoel.blogspot.com/ & http://www.justforchange.blogspot.com/
Is this a real blog or just a spammer blog? This can't be real. It's a joke, right?
that's funny, that is EXACTLY what i thought when i visited YOUR blog.
...small world huh?
yes avandeg, welcome to reality.
Let me break this to you gently.
Bush didn't steal the 2000 election, he didn't plan and execute the Sept.11th attacks, he's not in-cahoots with Bin Laden, he didn't have a secret military draft (vote or die), he didn't blow up the levies in N.O.,.. oh yeah and he wasn't behind the flu vaccine shortage or the mining accidents and he's not resposnible for global warming.
whew, i know that's a lot for your progressive, forward thinking brain to get itself around at one time, but... avandeg, it's time you got off the koolaid and heard the "rest of the story".
you're a big boy now and we can tell you the truth.
and while we're at it... take off those silly earmuffs.
oh,..and have a nice day.
-red
I'm not a conspiracy theorist so I don't jump to conclusions (like you're doing about the AP stories and the liberal media).
Bush did steal the 2000 election with his buddies in the Supreme Court. Every count that's been done in Florida shows that Gore actually got more votes there, but we don't need to debate that because you probably don't care about the facts. The truth is that this president is probably exactly what the country needed to see how inept and corrupt the conservative party really is. I'm not sure that they would have been bold enough to do all the things they got caught doing if he hadn't stolen the election.
I believe that September 11th was not planned by the president, but he was neglectful since he had all the information about bin Laden planning to strike. Guess you need someone like Clinton in office to foil an attack by terrorists like the first WTC bombing. Someone who pays attention to security issues.
Funny that you would bring up Katrina. Isn't that a thorn in the side of this administration. Look how pitiful our response was to that. We are so lucky that there has been no real terrorist attack.
Actually we're not lucky. You can thank this president for no attacks. When you are self-destructing as badly as we are everywhere, the terrorists know that another attack would likely just unite us and give us a second wind. We'd probably blow that just like we did the first one, but they have no reason to give us the chance. Why do you think they only attack our allies? Spain, France and UK? They want everyone to abandon us and let us go down by ourselves. Then they can pick the next biggest target and separate them from the pack and take them down. Guerilla tactics on a global scale.
okay aaron i was about to just give up on you as a no-hoper, but you show flashes of understanding...so we'll continue this.
First i must point out that you claim NOT to be a conspiracy theorist, but the next thing you say is that their was a conspiracy in the 2000 election.
WRONG:
http://www.answers.com/topic/u-s-presidential-election-2000
Gore lost every single recount. The speculation was that IF...(IF) all of the overvotes AND all of the undervotes were counted in select counties, then GORE could have gotten more votes.
But aaron...you can't count votes that are invalid or that can't legally be counted-period. GORE LOST THE ELECTION...fair and square. Unless you believe the fake story by fake "journalist" david podvin who claimed that Karl Rove and NBC's Jack Welsh had a secret deal?... either way you disproved your first claim with your first statement.
2- right,..bill and monica were down there protecting the WTC. One thing is for sure...if this were Clintons war..you'd be a big supporter. right? or did you condemn his little wars?
andnow for your "flashes" of understanding...
"You can thank this president for no attacks".
CORRECT- why do you think the terrorists aplauded (as recently as yesterday) a democrat victory in our elections?
But then you spend the next 3 or 4 lines saying BUSH had nothing to do with us not being attacked.
They attack where they can attack when they can attack. And if you think they don't want to attack again here..you are badly misled.
However there is something to the idea that it makes more sense for them to attack AFTER Democrats take control... and especially after BUSH is gone.
THey do fear George Bush, and know that any attacks will be met with extreme force...but they also know and hope the democrats will do exactly what the democrats are saying they will do...NOTHING.
what would you do if you were them?
(since you seem to support their side perhaps you have a better understanding of their thinking)
-red
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
sorry folks, but i had to remove avandeg's final comment as he has resorted to mere insults, namecalling and bad language.
I hope he takes his own advise and talks to someone (get's help) for his anger problem.
-red
Wow! That's funny that you would lie and say I used foul language and resorted to name calling. Everything I said was constructive criticism, but that's ok. Just tells me that you have to use censorship to keep the truth from seeping in.
Good luck with that too.
Guess you'll probably delete that too.
And this?
How about this?
This one too?
This?
and this one?
what about this?
smiley faces too? :)
merry christmases?
happy new years?
happy new years?
you should filter these...
you should filter these...
you should filter these...
you should filter these...
you should filter these...
you should filter these...
no, i am more than happy to let you show everyone how mature you are(not).
now you are a liar.
unless you consider calling me a "bastard"(your word)... not cursing or not namecalling.
I will now turn you in for spamming.
-red
Post a Comment
<< Home