Friday, October 31, 2008

Obama's Incredible Changing Tax Hike on YOU

Breaking NEWS:

Governor Bill Richardson (D) NM speaking on behalf of the Obama campaign announced on Denver Colorado's KOA 850 AM today that Obama's tax increase on the (so-called) rich is now down to $120,000.00 per year per family.

Obama started his campaign claiming he would only raise taxes on those making over $1million per year... then it became... only raising taxes on those making over $500,000.00 per year... then it became ONLY on those making over $250,000.00 per year.... then Obama said he would ONLY raise taxes on those making over $225,000.00 per year.... then we heard Obama's VP nominee Joe Biden admit that Obama will raise taxes on those making over $150,000.00 per year... and now today, Gov. Bill Richardson who was speaking on behalf of the Obama campaign just admitted that they are going to raise taxes on every family making over $120,000.00 per year.

In fact, Obama (if elected) would raise taxes on ALL AMERICANS as he has declared that he will let the Bush tax cuts expire.... meaning a family earning over $40,000 will see a tax increase resulting from the Bush tax cuts expiring. Obama conveniently leaves this out.

In addition, Obama has NEVER in his short and uneventful political career voted to reduce taxes... not once. Obama has voted over 90 times to increase taxes however including a vote to increase taxes on families earning just over $40,000.00 per year.

John McCain will lower YOUR taxes, cut wasteful spending, fight corruption AND fight our enemies wherever they may hide.

email from Michelle Obama asking for MONEY... lol

"Dear (poor people and those hurting from the economy),

I know this campaign has asked a lot of you.

But in the next 5 days, Barack will need you more than ever before.

Together, we can make sure all voters head to the polls and make their voices heard in this election. And we can get Barack's message of change out to millions and millions of Americans in these final hours.

That's why I'm asking you to dig deep and make one final donation to help get us across the finish line."...

My reply:

Dear Michelle,
While I understand that you are most certainly "high maintenance" ($), I also understand that your husband lied about taking matching campaign funds and instead raised and spent well over $100million trying to defeat John McCain while McCain kept his word and has spent less than $10million...

Michelle... if over $100million wasn't enough do it, I'm afraid asking for another $100mil won't get it done either.

Is this how it will be if your husband is elected?
Changing the deal, always asking (or just taking) more of our money and never getting quite enough? It appears by your actions, that is the case.

Here's an idea.... why don't you and Barack take some of that $100million you already collected and "spread some of that wealth around"?

Gov't Control of the Media: Is This America or Venezuela?

Apparently learning a lesson from fellow socialist/communist Hugo Chavez, Barack Obama has kicked 3 major newspapers who had endorsed McCain off his plane in an attempt to control the news, control the facts and control the media in true communist fashion.

Last week the Obama campaign also banned a TV news station in Florida from access to the presidential candidate due to tough questions being asked of VP nominee Joe Biden.... and another station that reported on the Biden Florida interview debacle.

Folks... what you are witnessing is the systematic destruction and control of the news media by Barack Obama.
Journalism is dead and government (Democrat) controlled media is only a heartbeat away where no criticism of Obama will be tolerated.

Is this America?


Former Clinton Campain Worker Spills The Beans About Obama

A friend sent this to me... it was posted on the forum...

"After a long and careful consideration of all the implications and possible consequences of my actions today, I have decided to go through with this in the hope that our country can indeed be guided into the right direction. First, a little personal background… I am a female grad student in my 20’s, and a registered Democrat.

During the primaries, I was a campaign worker for the Clinton candidacy. I believed in her and still do, staying all the way to the bitter end. And believe me, it was bitter. The snippets you’ve heard from various media outlets only grazed the surface. There was no love between the Clinton and Obama campaigns, and these feelings extended all the way to the top.

Hillary was no dope though, and knew that any endorsement of Obama must appear to be a full-fledged one. She did this out of political survival. As a part of his overall effort to extend an olive branch to the Clinton camp and her supporters, Obama took on a few Hillary staff members into his campaign. I was one such worker.

Though I was still bitterly loyal to Hillary, I still held out hope that he would choose her as VP. In fact, there was a consensus among us transplants that in the end, he HAD to choose her. It was the only logical choice. I also was committed to the Democratic cause and without much of a second thought, transferred my allegiance to Senator Obama.

I’m going to let you in on a few secrets here, and this is not because I enjoy the gossip or the attention directed my way. I’m doing this because I doubt much of you know the true weaknesses of Obama. Another reason for my doing this is that I am lost faith in this campaign, and feel that this choice has been forced on many people in this country.

Put simply, you are being manipulated. That was and is our job – to manipulate you (the electorate) and the media (we already had them months ago). Our goal is to create chaos with the other side, not hope. I’ve come to the realization (as the campaign already has) that if this comes to the issues, Barack Obama doesn’t have a chance. His only chance is to foster disorganization, chaos, despair, and a sense of inevitability among the Republicans.

It has worked up until now. Joe the Plumber has put the focus on the issues again, and this scares us more than anything. Being in a position to know these things, I will rate what the Obama campaign already knows are their weak links from the most important on down.

1 – Hillary voters. Internal polling suggests that at best, we are taking 70-75% of these voters. Other estimates are as low as 60% in some areas – particularly Ohio and western PA. My biggest problem with this campaign’s strategy was the decision NOT to offer Hillary the VP slot. She was ready and able to take this on, and would have campaigned enthusiastically for it. This selection would have also brought virtually all of her supporters into the fold, and the Obama campaign knew it. Though I have no way of knowing this for certain, and I do admit that I am relying on internal gossip, Senator Obama actually went against the advice of his top advisors. They wanted him to choose her, but the only significant opposition to this within the campaign came from Barack and Michelle Obama. In short, he let personal feelings take precedence over what was the most logical thing to do. Biden, by the way, has been a disaster inside the campaign. Everyone cringes whenever he gives an interview, and he creates so many headaches as the campaign has to stay on their toes in order to disseminate information and spin whatever it was he was trying to say.

2 – Sarah Palin. Don’t believe what the media is telling you about how horrible a choice she was. Again, our internal polling suggest that though she has had a minimal impact on pulling disaffected Hillary Democrats to McCain, she has done wonders in mobilizing the base for McCain. Another thing – we were completely taken by surprise with her pick. In my capacity in the research department, I looked into the backgrounds of Leiberman, Romney, Pawlenty and Ridge, and prepared briefs. I don’t mind bragging that we had pretty good stuff on all of them. With Leiberman, the plan was to paint him as an erratic old-timer who didn’t have a clue as to what he was doing (pretty much a clone of McCain). In Romney, we had him pegged as an evil capitalist who cut jobs. Pawlenty was going to get the “Quayle treatment”, or more precisely: a pretty face, with no valid experience. Tom Ridge was going to be used to provide a direct link from McCain to Bush. As you can see, we were quite enamored of all of them. Then the unexpected happened – Sarah Palin. We had no clue as to how to handle her, and bungled it from the start. Though through our misinformation networks, we have successfully taken some of the shine off. But let there be no doubt. She remains a major obstacle. She has singlehanded solidified “soft” Republican support, mobilized the McCain ground game, and has even had some appeal to independents and Hillary voters. This is what our internal polling confirms.

3 – Obama’s radical connections. Standards operating procedure has been to cry “racism” whenever one of these has been brought up. We even have a detailed strategy ready to go should McCain ever bring Rev. Wright up. Though by themselves they are of minimal worth, taken together, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Father Pfelger, and now, Rashid Khalili, are exactly what the campaign does not need. The more focus on them, the more this election becomes a referendum on Obama. The campaign strategy from the very beginning was to make this election a referendum on Bush. Strategists have been banging their head on how successfully McCain has distanced himself from Bush. This has worked, and right now the tide is in his favor. People are taking a new look at Barack Obama, and our experience when this happens tells us this is not good news at all. When they take a look at him, one or more of these names are bound to be brought up. McCain has wisely not harped on this in recent weeks and let voters decide for themselves. This was a trap we set for him, and he never fully took the bait. Senator Obama openly dared him to bring up Ayers. This was not due to machismo on the part of Obama, but actually due to campaign strategy. Though McCain’s reference to Ayers fell flat in the last debate, people in the Obama campaign were actually disappointed that he didn’t follow through on it more and getting into it. Our focus groups found this out: When McCain brings these connections up, voters are turned off to him. They’d rather take this into consideration themselves, and when this happens, our numbers begin to tank.

4 – The Bradley Effect. Don’t believe these polls for a second. I just went over our numbers and found that we have next to no chance in the following states: Missouri, Indiana, North Carolina, Florida, New Hampshire and Nevada. Ohio leans heavily to McCain, but is too close to call it for him. Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa are the true “toss up states”. The only two of these the campaign feels “confident” in are Iowa and New Mexico. The reason for such polling discrepancy is the Bradley Effect, and this is a subject of much discussion in the campaign. In general, we tend to take a -10 point percentage in allowing for this, and are not comfortable until the polls give us a spread well over this mark. This is why we are still campaigning in Virginia and Pennsylvania! This is why Ohio is such a desperate hope for us! What truly bothers this campaign is the fact that some pollsters get up to an 80% “refuse to respond” result. You can’t possibly include these into the polls. The truth is, people are afraid to let people know who they are voting for. The vast majority of these respondents are McCain supporters. Obama is the “hip” choice, and we all know it.

As part of my research duties, I scour right wing blogs and websites to get somewhat of a “feel” as to what is being talked about on the other side. Much of it is nonsense, but there are some exceptions which give the campaign jitters. A spirited campaign has been made to infiltrate many pro-Hillary sites and discredit them. A more disorganized, but genuine effort has also been made to sow doubts among the unapologetically right wing sites such as Don’t you guys get it? This has been the Obama campaign’s sole strategy from the very beginning! The only way he wins is over a dispirited, disorganized, and demobilized opposition. This is how it has been for all of his campaigns. What surprises me is that everyone has fallen for it. You may point to the polls as proof of the inevitability of all of this. If so, you have fallen for the oldest trick in the book. How did we skew these polls, you might ask? It all starts with the media “buzz” which has been generated over the campaign. Many stories are generated on the powerful Obama ground game, and how many new voters were registered. None of this happens by coincidence. It is all part of the poll-skewing process. This makes pollsters change their mixes to reflect these new voters and tilt the mix more towards Democratic voters. What is not mentioned or reported on is not the “under-reported cell phone users or young voters” we hear so much about. What is underreported is you.

I changed my somewhat positive opinion of this campaign during the unfair and sexist campaign against Sarah Palin. I will never agree with her on the issues and will probably never vote for her, but I am embarrassed of what has happened. I can’t ignore our own hand in all of this.

What I do know is that I will not be voting for Obama this time around.
Treat that as you will."

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Obama's Halloween Rules For Your Children

If you are a loyal Barack Obama supporter then I have some GOOD NEWS for you regarding Halloween and "Trick or Treat" night.

In following with Barack Obama's tax plan for America and "spreading the wealth", when your children go out trick or treating Friday night, there is a new rule.... let's call it the OBAMA RULE:

After going house to house and door to door for blocks and blocks getting their bags full of candy and goodies, children are now required to give at least 50% (1/2) of their candy and goodies to kids who didn't go trick or treating either because their parents would not let them or they were too lazy or whatever the reason. Heck, even if they don't have a reason.

Never mind that your children dressed up and went out in the cold themselves and got the candy... the lesson here is that they MUST give half of whatever they got... that they are required to give their candy to those who didn't bother going to get candy.

Hey kids, it's the OBAMA way!


Obama; Running Short on "Friends"

10 Reasons to NOT be Barack Obama's friend.

1- Obama will throw you under the bus if (when) anyone finds out you were friends.

2- To qualify you must be either a former terrorist, know one, or want to be one.

3- It means you are probably a communist or a socialist who is about to be "outed".

4- It means you are probably involved with shady real estate deals, kickbacks and slush funds.

5- It means you will soon have too many secrets about Obama to keep secret.

6- It means you probably hate America and think you have the right to take money from those that have made more and then give it to those of your choosing.

7- It means you must be either willing to lie about Obama yourself or you must be willing to believe and repeat Obama and Biden's lies.

8- It means you probably attend (by coincidence) the same America hating church and totally disagree with the pastor but like your friend, you never mention it.

9- It possibly means that you work for ACORN and are getting paid to be his friend (and get him elected).

10- If you are Barack Hussein Obama's friend... good luck and watch your back and watch out for buses.

Labels: , , , , ,

McCain Surging... Obama Falling In Polls



Published on on October 28, 2008

Printer-Friendly Version

Zogby, Rasmussen and Gallup all report McCain closing to 5 points back. Zogby had him 12 back, Rasmussen 8 and Gallup 6 in their previous polling. McCain's use of the Joe the Plumber and the tax issue in his ads is working! Full Story...

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Media Betray us: LA Times Refusing to release Video of Obama and terrorist Rashid Khalidi

FOX News - "The Los Angeles Times is refusing to release a videotape that it says shows Barack Obama praising a Chicago professor who was an alleged mouthpiece for the Palestine Liberation Organization while it was a designated terrorist group in the 1970s and '80s.

According an LA Times article written by Peter Wallsten in April, Obama was a "friend and frequent dinner companion" of Rashid Khalidi, who from 1976 to1982 was reportedly a director of the official Palestinian press agency, WAFA, which was operating in exile from Beirut with the PLO."

Click here to read the original LA Times story: 'Palestinians See a Friend in Barack Obama.'

Labels: , , ,

MEMO: To All News Media Outlets

Until further notice, the following subjects are off limits when talking to Barack Obama and/or Joe Biden or even when talking ABOUT Barack Obama and/or Joe Biden.

Official Obama Banned List of News Subjects:
The Obama-Biden Campaign has officially banned the following subjects and will refuse interview access with "the One" to any news agency that violates this ban.

1- Obama's socialist programs, Obama's socialist background and Obama's socialist ties, terms like "spread the wealth" and/or "each according to his ability, each according to his need".

2- Any reference to Karl Marx, Groucho Marx, Harpo Marx, Vladimir Lenin, John Lennon or Stalin.

3- Islam, Jihad, Madrassa, Iraq, Iran or the name "Hussein".

4- Any reference to Obama's radical pastor for over 20 years the good Reverend Jeremiah "God damn America" Wright.

5- Any questions about the fact that 60's radical terrorist bomber Bill Ayers launched Obama's political career from his living room and their continued relationship until just recently.

6- Joe Rezko, real estate, shady land deals, corruption, pay-ola, slush funds, kickbacks.

7- Plagairism, Gaffes or lies.

8- Campaign and tax money spent with Joe Biden's "family" businesses.

9- ACORN, voter fraud or Mickey Mouse.

10- Any use of the words "surge", "victory in Iraq", Radical Muslims, Muslim, Islamic Fascism, liberty, free speech, freedom, abortion, immigration, taxes, capitalism, free enterprise or conservative thought.

11- There will be no further mention of LA Times article written by Peter Wallsten in April, where Obama was said he was a "friend and frequent dinner companion" of Rashid Khalidi, who from 1976 to1982 was reportedly a director of the official Palestinian press agency, WAFA, which was operating in exile from Beirut with the PLO." or the VIDEO of Obama praising Rashid Khalidi that the LA Times admits it is sitting on.


Obama-Biden Bans Another TV Station...

hat tip to Musings of a Muskogee Politico
In an all out effort to ban tough questions or any negative talk about Barack Obama and Joe Biden, it appears yet another TV station has felt the wrath...

... so whats next? A ban on tough questions?

Compare Barack Obama to John McCain Before Voting

Newest McCain-Palin ad... "compare".

Shocking News: Democrats Behind Smear Campaign On Joe The Plumber

Official Admits Plumbing for Dirt on Joe

By Mark Impomeni
Oct 28th 2008 10:25AM

Filed Under:eDemocrats, Barack Obama, 2008 President

The Director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Helen Jones-Kelly, said yesterday that she authorized a check of state computer records on Joe Wurzelbacher, Joe the Plumber, after the Holland, OH citizen became the focus of national attention after the third presidential debate. Jones-Kelley, a Democrat and supporter of Sen. Barack Obama, she donated the maximum $2,300 to his presidential campaign, denied any political motivation in ordering the search of Wurzelbacher's child-support payment records. "Our practice is when someone is thrust quickly into the public spotlight we often take a look at them," she said.

Wurzelbacher has had the national press and Ohio local and state governments checking into his background ever since Sen. John McCain seized on comments Sen. Obama made in an impromptu meeting with Wurzelbacher two weeks ago. Wurzelbacher asked Obama about his tax plans and Obama responded that his tax policy was intended to "spread the wealth around." McCain has used the remark to great affect on the campaign trail and mentioned the remarks and Wurzelbacher more than a dozen times in the third debate. Obama's comments have served to inject energy into the McCain camp and have caused the Obama campaign to stumble a little in the homestretch, as questions about his tax policy and desire to redistribute wealth have become the focus of voter attention.

Jones-Kelly's admission marks at least the fourth occasion in which Wurzelbacher's records were accessed through state computer systems since McCain mentioned his conversation with Sen. Obama.
The Ohio Inspector General, State Highway Patrol, and Attorney General's office are all investigating various potential breaches of Wurzelbacher's private records to determine if there was any political motivation to the inquiries.
But it is clear that no one would have been looking into Wurzelbacher had he not questioned Sen. Obama and if his story was not potentially damaging to Obama's campaign.

The Obama campaign has a history of attempting to silence it's criics, twice ordering supporters to call a Chicago radio station and protest segements discussing Obama's work with unrepentant terrorist William Ayers.

The Obama campaign's belief in the power of the people apparently stops at a private citizen's right to ask probing questions about Sen. Obama's policies and history.

Monday, October 27, 2008

I Couldn't Agree More... Throw the book and back the bus...

The post that the left won’t read

Posted by: Neocon in 2008 Race, Nutter Butters

This is the sort of post that the left doesn’t believe exists.

Contrary to popular leftist internet belief, when those of us on the right find a snake among us, we run them out much like our congressional counterparts. It doesn’t do much to help keep legislative control but it does keep a clean conscious.

That being said, meet the snake:

Isn’t that picture cute? From the buzz going around, she might not even have a black eye. How foolish do you have to be to not only fake a hate crime but also not even bother to reproduce physical markings? As much as I hate to say it, there might be a reason why our campaign volunteers aren’t getting out the vote, my friends. In fact, if we’ve got many more people like Ms. Todd in our midsts then we don’t deserve to win. I’m sickened that I’m supporting the same candidate as this woman.

Then again, she was apparently a Ron Paul supporter.

No, that isn’t a cheap Ron Paul shot all you little Roniacs out there- I just couldn’t help myself. We all own a little of this kook. What does this show? It shows that there are loonies on both sides of the political aisle. I’ve never lumped in the average liberal voter with the people pouring pink paint all over themselves on the national mall and I would hope that those latte-sipping libs laughing themselves silly over this mess wouldn’t make a similar mistake with us, ideological differences aside.

What else is there to say?Throw the book at her.

Better make sure that you’re recording the sentencing, though, I’d hate for her to start a new round of claims.

Wake Up America, Obama = Radical Socialism

Will Americans be fooled into voting themselves into a socialist government?

Obama is using the distraction of "FREE MONEY" to convince enough middle class voters to join the poor who don't pay taxes into socialism.

Obama will have the power to do whatever he wants, having the two MOST liberal members in both the house (Nancy Pelosi) and Senate (Harry Reid) leading him around and having their way with YOUR money and YOUR freedom of speech and control over YOUR life.

SOCIALISM vs Free Enterprise and capitalism.

Government control of banks, education, healthcare, auto industry, energy industry... government control of YOU.

The time to WAKE UP is now America, we have been invaded from within and our very foundation is being challenged.

VOTE FOR FREEDOM, Liberty, the individual, vote for Joe the Plumbers and Sarah Palins
and regular people who aspire to do more, do better and prosper... vote for John McCain and vote against socialism, communism, progressivism, democratism or whatever they want to call it today. Vote to save America, save our Republic, save our individual freedoms, save our economy and perhaps save the world.
-red stater

Labels: , , ,

Obama Can't Close Deal, McCain Surging To Finish

IBD Poll: McCain in Dead Heat with Obama


Sen. John McCain has narrowed Sen. Barack Obama's lead in the latest IBD/TIPP poll. Obama now leads 46.5 percent to 43.3 percent. The poll's margin of error is +/- 3 percentage points.

McCain cut 0.7 point off Obama’s lead Sunday in the Investor's Business Daily/TechnoMetrica Institute of Policy and Politics poll, as undecided voters have started to commit.

According to the poll:

  • McCain has a 13-point lead with married women.

  • Obama has a 41-point lead with single women.

  • Obama has a 10-point lead with women overall.

  • McCain has a 6-point lead with men overall.

  • Obama leads in the Northeast, Midwest, and West.

  • McCain leads in the South.

  • Obama Spokesman: Proper question Is Obama Socialist or Communist

    "How Is Senator Obama not being a Marxist when he says spread the wealth around?"

    Reporter Barbara West simply phrased the question wrongly according to an Obama campaign spokesman this morning.
    Marxism is a form of communism and Obama is accused of being a socialist... which are two completely different subjects according to the Obama people, so the question was not valid, thus Joe Biden's "huh?... is this a joke"? response.

    So.. let's rephrase the question for Senator Biden....

    Senator, would YOU describe Barack Obama's "spread the wealth" redistribution proposal to be more representative of his socialist or communist philosphy... and as a followup, would you consider him more of a student of Lennin, Stalin or Marx... if you had to pick one over the other?

    There.... is that better?

    Ahhh, ...So When Obama Said "Change", ...This is what he meant.

    Thanks to Michelle Malkin and Jeff Goldstein

    In Obama’s America, we’ll finally be able to break free of the “constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution” — and in so doing, achieve “social justice” through “redistributive change.”

    "Redistributive change".... that has a nice ring to it doesn't it?

    Break free of the constraints of the Constitution?

    Maybe just shorten it to "change" so as not to confuse those folks out there clinging to their bibles and guns who might think redistribution sounds like socialism (because it is).

    "Change".... yeah, go with that one.

    Labels: , ,

    Police Warning: If Obama Wins... Riots Will Occur, If Obama Loses... Riots Will Occur

    Hat-tip to Okie Campaigns

    Police departments across the country, primarily in larger inner city areas are beefing up security in anticipation of riots following the election on November 4th.

    It seems that either way, we are looking at trouble... coming from the Obama supporters.

    No, you won't see any conservative blue haired old ladies out burning police cars on Nov 5th, or conservative middle age working guys out looting and destroying property... no, you will see the liberal left Obamanation in full force.

    Are you sure that these are the people you want in charge of our government for the next 4 years?

    Labels: , , , , , , ,

    Sunday, October 26, 2008

    Obama's Playbook: Alinsky's "Rules For Radicals"

    Thanks to Flopping Aces

    Since Flopping Aces had self-described Marxist, and former New Party member/activist, Carl Davidson, pay us a visit on my prior post, Socialist Obama in Trouble? thread…. I thought I should distribute some ammo - in the form of information - to the community.

    Obama’s community organizing roots, his political philosophy and socialist visions for the US (or outright Marxist, if he would be as honest as Carl Davidson was in describing his beliefs), all follow the Saul Alinsky “Rules for Radicals” playbook for implementation.

    Since these Chicago thuggery tactics have been used via the DNC on opposition candidates for decades, in order to brainwash the middle income voter into their circles, I’m going to repeat them here.

    Memorize these Alinsky rules… and when you’re done, memorize them again. Listen very carefully to each and every tactic the Obama campaign… and the candidate himself… uses daily. You will see them incorporated into their every press conference, speech and visual ad.

    Knowledge is power. When you know what “the enemy” (using Alinsky’s own description of the opposition) is doing, you are less likely to fall prey.

    Tactics mean doing what you can with what you have

    Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. In the world of give and take, tactics is the art of how to take and how to give. Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.

    For an elementary illustration of tactics, take parts of your face as the point of reference; your eyes, your ears, and your nose. First the eyes; if you have organized a vast, mass-based people’s organization, you can parade it visibly before the enemy and openly show your power. Second the ears; if your organization is small in numbers, then…conceal the members in the dark but raise a din and clamor that will make the listener believe that your organization numbers many more than it does. Third, the nose; if your organization is too tiny even for noise, stink up the place.

    Always remember the first rule of power tactics:

    Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.


    Never go outside the experience of your people.

    When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.


    Wherever possible go outside of the experience of the enemy.

    Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

    The fourth rule is:

    Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.

    You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.

    The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule:

    Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

    It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.

    Sixth rule:

    A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.

    If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
    A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.

    Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment.
    Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions,
    and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
    The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
    The major premise for tactics is the development of operations
    that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
    If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that
    every positive has its negative.
    The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.

    You cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his suddenly agreeing with your demand and saying “You’re right - we don’t know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us.”
    Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

    In conflict tactics there are certain rules that the organizer should always regard as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and “frozen.” By this I mean that in a complex, interrelated, urban society, it becomes increasingly difficult to single out who is to blame for any particular evil. There is a constant, and somewhat legitimate, passing of the buck. The target is always trying to shift responsibility to get out of being the target.

    One of the criteria in picking your target is the target’s vulnerability -
    where do you have the power to start?

    Furthermore, the target can always say, “Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?” When you “freeze the target,” you disregard these arguments and, for the moment, all others to blame.

    Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all of the “others” come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target.

    The other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract such as a community’s segregated practices or a major corporation or City Hall. It is not possible to develop the necessary hostility against, say, City Hall, which after all is a concrete, physical, inanimate structure, or against a corporation, which has no soul or identity, or a public school administration, which again is an inanimate system.

    Labels: , , ,

    Al Qaeda "Endorses" McCain, Attempt to help Obama Win

    From the blogger news network...

    Using Reverse Psychology, Al Qaeda Endorses Obama

    Posted on October 25th, 2008

    It’s a bit shocking, really, that the Washington Post rushed to print an alleged endorsement of John McCain by Al Qaeda.

    Missing was any verification by authorities that it was authored by anyone in command of any of its tawdry, misanthropic, holier-than-thou, spiritually moronic band of woman-beating, bombing and beheading throwbacks.

    One wonders what the motive of the Washington Post could have been to act (again) as the mouthpiece for terrorists without any fact-checking, a term that has apparently been erased from its editors’ lexicon.

    It apparently doesn’t occur to them that it’s possibly not to provide free advertisement for them. Apparently, all one has to do to effect instantaneous worldwide publication of one’s opinion – and influence a Presidential election in the United States – is claim to be Al Qaeda and endorse a candidate.

    Not only that, but then the Leftist press in America will pick it up and circulate it as truth.

    Meanwhile, the purpose of these Al Qaeda poseurs in attempting to tamper with U.S. presidential elections – given that they do not get a vote – represents several things:

    The Memo. Just another little missive from your blood-lusting Islamofascist superiors that they are the ones to be in charge, lest you forget, so they expect you to follow their instructions. The veiled threat of violence will be legitimately assumed.

    Egoistic Arrogance. Of course we must be interested in their opinion.

    The use of the most transparent form of reverse psychology. What Al Qaeda wants – since it wants our destruction – must be what we don’t want. So if they say they want Obama, we will, like lemmings, rush to Obama, because if they want McCain it’s our sacred duty as loyal Americans to support the other candidate. Or, so they hope.

    Now, let’s flesh that out a little bit, since whether Americans get it or not, the media obviously doesn’t.

    Did the headlines say, “Al Qaeda makes attempt to smear McCain with ‘endorsement.’” Nope, but they should have.

    Did the headlines say, “Al Qaeda throws support behind Obama with phony McCain endorsement?” Nope, but they should have.

    Did the headlines say, “Al Qaeda plays same game as last election with manipulative ‘endorsement.’” Nope, but they should have.

    What every single or implied headline said was: “Al Qaeda Endorses McCain.”

    Of course Al Qaeda doesn’t endorse McCain. Al Qaeda –like Hizbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood , and Hamas – endorses Obama. And that is not because he is a Muslim, for he is not. He has belonged for 20 years to a virulently anti-white Black Liberation Theology church in Chicago. He converted from Islam to Christianity before puberty, so imams have no authority to issue fatawa against him charging apostasy. Obama was registered as a Muslim at an Indonesian school. He does have Islamic training. But he is no longer a Muslim. Obama is Leftist, not radical Islamist. No, it’s none of that.

    What thrills Islamofascists – a term coined by Matthias Ruthven and perhaps used as early as the 1970s by Olivier Roy – is that they are looking for a Presidential candidate whose thinking and policy they can infiltrate. And that have found one in Obama. After all, the express wish of the Council on American-Islamic Relations – CAIR, an unindicted co-conspirator in terrorist financing and the group that used to called itself “Hamas in the United States” – is to see shari’a law implemented in America. ICNA and ISNA, both also unindicted co-conspirators in terrorist financing, have also gravitated to Obama, and in the case of ISNA it’s a real problem. These are the guys that made hay over the Headscarf Photo Flap – widely used to paint Muslims as victims in Obama’s campaign. Rep. Keith Ellison went after Obama with a vengeance, and he got everything he wanted and then some. Here’s how it went.

    Two Muslim women in headscarves positioned themselves behind Obama at a photo shoot. One of them was a member of the deeply suspect MSA, about which volumes have been written in the last two years recounting their indoctrination to radical Islam of Muslim students by this campus organization. MSA is also tainted by accusations of women within their own ranks that they were forced into Islamic dress cover as a kind of religious testimony to the faith. Of course, Muslim men never put up with the inconvenience of wear hot robes in the Dog Days of Summer to “testify for their faith.” No, it’s the women who have to do that. One woman recounts being called by the head of an MSA wing, a man who then put his wife on the phone with the girl so the wife could scream at her for not complying with stated dress norms. This echoes, of course, the virulent Saudi Princess Haifa, wife of former Ambassador Bandar bin Sultan (who had the habit of strolling into Cabinet meetings uninvited, so powerful was he), who frequently called embassy wives together for her verbally violent punishment soiress where the women were scathed for the slightest infractions of dress or “morals.” Yeah, right. The tactic here is to have a woman discipline another woman at the behest of a male, who will then have to bear no responsibility for being the male chauvinist pig he is. Any questions?

    Anyhow, these two Muslim women positioned themselves for an Obama photo shoot that I can promise you would have been distributed all over the Middle East as a fund-raising poster for ISNA. Meanwhile, back in the United States, CAIR and other Muslim propaganda groups screamed “Discrimination!” (which it was not) and then “Racism!” Now that last one is interesting given that Islam is not a race: It is a lift from the Civil Rights Movement, where it was legitimate, but the propagandists are aware that Americans are very sensitive to accusations of racism and too afraid of appearing racist to fight the false accusation when they are smeared with it. There should be a class action lawsuit brought against CAIR, ISNA, ICNA and every other group that uses this false epithet to silence everybody who doesn’t agree with them.

    At any rate, it is with the Headscarf Flap that I really began to feel for Obama. He is not an anti-Muslim person. Far from it. And it is likely his staff would have had the same reaction to anybody brandishing a sign that read “Zionists for Obama” in Trajan font or somebody waving a massive crucifix with “Stop Abortion” carved on it. No sane Presidential candidate is going to allow his or her campaign to be appropriated for religious advertising.

    In this case it was a simple case of Islamic Billboarding, the presence of a headscarf to visually claim space to make a silent representation of a connection with or control of a political or social unit or physical space. OK, I confess to having invented the term. But that’s what it is in some cases.

    This supposed connection of Islam with Obama did not and does not exist — at least not until now. But now it does exist.

    How powerful is IslamicBillboarding? Well, it’s pretty powerful. It can make it appear that Obama is Muslim, which most in the Muslim world already believe he is (and that will be a problem for him if he is elected), and it also makes it appear that MSA and ISNA and CAIR appear to be very powerful in American politics in general and in Obama’s campaign in particular.

    And the upshot of all this is that Obama got creamed, in three specific ways.

    First he was rapped for “racism” and the women in headscarves were quickly fashioned into victims by CAIR.

    Second, he got Rep. Keith Ellison, the first Muslim on Congress, all over him publicly. But after a few weeks, Ellison and others had strong-armed Obama into total submission.

    Third, part of that “submission” (there’s that word again) is that Obama has a new “Muslim advisor” who has radical connections thoroughly discussed in several articles in the last two weeks, the best of which articles was Daniel Pipes’ article “Would Obama Pass a Security Clearance?” Answer: No.

    So, faced with bad press and intimidation by the bad guys most likely to behead you if they don’t like you, what does Obama do? He fronts a headscarf in the form of Ingrid Mattson, president of ISNA — the same-same unindicted co-conspirator in terrorist financing named above – for a precious little “Interfaith Moment” at the Democratic National Convention.

    Watch this closely, for it is shocking indeed. In a country in which MOST Muslim women do NOT wear cover, Ingrid Mattson is one of the few high-ranking Muslim women who does. So what Muslim woman does Obama choose for his token? One of the many U.S. Muslim women who is moderate? No.

    Ingrid Mattson is a Saudi Wahhabi apologist and a radical. What would happen to Ingrid if she appeared on Saudi TV without a face veil? She’d be stoned to death. What would happen if she showed up at the Grand Mosque dressed as she was on American national TV? She would have been whipped to death on the streets by the religious police. Ingrid Mattson, like Al-Arabiya’s Nadia Bilbassy-Charters – who interviewed Laura Bush at the White House dressed in a skirt halfway up her thigh and appeared at the National Press Club in a skin-tight, white satin sheath with a hemline higher than that! – is one of the Spin Sisters, one of the women fronted by radical Islamist men to make them appear to be gender egalitarian when they are not. Women like Ingrid Mattson could care less what happens to the rest of the oppressed Muslim women of this world so long as they get theirs. Look at Mattson’s position? Fame. Power. A little more fame. Now she’s been seen on national TV in her headscarf, while defending the repressive Saudis. She has never made a a statement against FGM (which is mandatory in Shafi’i Sunni Islam), never lent support to Shirin Ebadi’s incredibly brave attempt to wrest women’s freedom from the Iranian mullahs, never decried the murder of Turkish feminist Konca Kouris, never hailed Farzana Hassan’s attempt to prevent shari’a law from being imposed in Canada, and never touted the scholarship of the devout Muslim women seeking a new, gender-egalitarian (it was ruined by centuries of overtly manipulative translation) hermeutics of the Qur’an.

    The headscarf means many things. Mostly it means ignorance of the fact that it was NEVER mandated by Muhammad and did not appear in Islamic culture until three centuries after the advent of Islam. Therefore many women who wear it do it because they think it is mandated and want to do the right thing. But in the West it is often holier-than-thou competition for men’s attention both with other Muslim women and with Western women they call “sluts” whether they have evidence for it or not. As a woman, I can’t tell you how infuriated I am at this accusation and how sick I am of hearing it.

    What headscarfing is, often, is political Islamic Billboarding at the behest of men. Worldwide, the headscarf is, overwhelming, male oppression of the female that prevents men from having to experience any anxiety that one of “their” women will be found a tempting little plumb by some other man. Men do not have to earn women’s love, they merely have to make an arrangement with her father for it (despite the Qur’an’s guarantee of freedom in marriage for women as well as men). In the strict Wahhabi orientation Ingrid Mattson refers to as a “reformation,” it is an act of slander against the female form as a sexual organ from toes to crown, with the exception of hands and eyes, a form that is utterly controlled and violently criminalized. How bad is it? In Saudi Arabia, the abaya covers everything but hands and eyes. Well, make that one eye. Last week the Wahhabi imams in Saudi Arabia said that one eye must be covered, because two eyes is just too much of an evil trap for a man’s sexual purity. This is an apparent attempt to control those lurid glances at the market, where women are already under the control of a male chaperone!

    But I digress. The point is that while Muslim women in Iran endure torture in Evin Prison to escape this oppression, it bothers Ingrid Mattson not at all to support oppression of Muslim women by sporting one herself in the name of faith.

    Anyhow, back to the Democratic National Convention. Here comes Ingrid Mattson in her headscarf – a payback from the alleged affront to the Muslim community for Obama’s refusal to have his campaign used for Islamic Billboarding. Ellison was pleased. The American Muslim community flocked to Obama’s side. Mattson made a speech that should have sent off screaming warning bells, but Americans behaved as if they were stricken with connexin-26 gene deafness.

    But this warrants another, closer look. Who else appeared? A Christian priest and a Jewish rabbi. Where were the Hindus, whose numbers in the USA are larger than those of the Muslims, who claim they are over 6 million when likely the most accurate number is 1.3 million? Where are the Buddhists? Where are the Jains? Where are the Native American medicine men? Where are the Baha’i and Amadiyyah, whom the Sunnis punish and persecute worldwide with charges of apostasy? Where are the Orthodox? Where are the Taoists and the Confucians? Where are the Sufis, so vilified by the Wahhabis and the Taleban — the Sufis whose European and American forms may represent the best hope for Muslims in America? Where are the New Agers, who in this country vastly outnumber the Muslims and are the fast-growing spiritual orientation in American (no, you were mislead, it is not the Muslims)?

    You will not find any of those faiths appearing with the radical-learning, Wahhabi-oriented, headscarf-flaunting Muslima Ingrid Mattson! Why? Because only the People of the Book – Jews and Christians – are even marginally acceptable to these 7th-century-styled Muslims, and all the rest are considered to be practitioners of illegitimate, if not Satanic, religions and faiths. Obama would not have made the mistake of including them when a Muslim speaks. He wouldn’t have dared. Especially since the entire purpose of this tawdry exercise was to front a headscarf in capitulation to intentionally-invented Muslim grievance.

    Is Obama a Muslim? No.

    Is Obama pandering to a radical Muslim minority? Yes.

    Is he accepting advisors who have radical links? Yes.

    Is he a coward? Yes. And that is the problem with Obama: He is woefully inexperienced, as this incident also shows, but he is, worse, a coward.

    Obama, despite his terrible associations, has only one real problem: He doesn’t know when he needs to stand up and refuse to cow to such pressures, and he doesn’t have the spine to do it when he does realize it.

    So, does Al Qaeda really want McCain to win? Of course not. They want Obama to win, because if he does, the whole problem of establishing shari’a law for Muslims in the United States (read: women, since shari’a is most concerned with keeping control of women) gets a lot easier. And that’s just the first step. It’s Muslims first, then everybody else. And they’ll do it with non-Muslims by using the tactic that the free speech, free choice, and free women of this culture are an insult to their faith. They will also use the “family law” codes that allow the also sexist (but not to anything like the same degree) Jewish Beths Din family law to institute legal shari’a courts (as in Britain) among Muslims here. Problematically, the vast majority of Muslims in America, moderates all, have caved to Saudi pressure for radical imams – Tabeban-trained in Pakistan or Wahhabi-trained in Saudi Arabia – to run American mosques. Now they run 80% of them, and the American Muslim community has not had the spine to correct the problem and doesn’t have it now.

    But make no mistake: Al Qaeda endorsed Obama because they already know, by everything he has done and all he has not done, that he is the best bet for entering American power centers by the back door. And Americans should be highly suspect of a media that helped them run this little piece of reverse psychology on the American public.

    And Americans should also realize that the evidence of Obama’s capitulation to what Stephen Schwartz calles “The Wahhabi Lobby” in the United States is incontrovertible and crystal clear:

    When a candidate for the Presidency of United States fronts a headscarf worn by a radical in a pandering and obsequious attempt to prevent bad press, he is too spineless and self-serving to be President of the United States.

    Stand UP Conservatives, Stand UP for America

    Hat-tip to the former head of NOW in LA... and former liberal... turned conservative, gun owner- Tammy Bruce.

    The time is now to stand up and be not afraid, do not give in and do not give up. Stand up America.

    McCain-Palin 08


    Obama-Biden Bullying Of News Media Not Good For America

    After seeing how Joe Biden responded to a fair question asked by news reporter Barbara West in Florida and how Barack Obama reacted to a fair question posed by Joe the Plumber... attack, discredit and punish seems to be the general response to any tough question posed to Biden or Obama... are we headed to the same system used by Hugo Chavez in Venezuela?

    "Article 147: "Anyone who offends with his words or in writing or in any other way disrespects the President of the Republic or whomever is fulfilling his duties will be punished with prison of 6 to 30 months if the offense is serious and half of that if it is light." That sanction, the code implies, applies to those who "disrespect" the president or his functionaries in private; "the term will be increased by a third if the offense is made publicly."

    There's more: Article 444 says that comments that "expose another person to contempt or public hatred" can bring a prison sentence of one to three years; Article 297a says that someone who "causes public panic or anxiety" with inaccurate reports can receive five years. Prosecutors are authorized to track down allegedly criminal inaccuracies not only in newspapers and electronic media, but also in e-mail and telephone communications."

    Obama and Joe Biden's refusal to answer questions and their outright bullying of the news media is very concerning to say the least... at least concerning to those of us who care about freedom of speech.

    Saturday, October 25, 2008

    Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America

    Hat-Tip to Jihadi Du Jour
    From Brigette Gabriel at ACT:

    Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America

    by Dr. Anis Shorrosh

    When we immigrated from Jerusalem, Jordan* in January, 1967, little did I imagine that Islam would become center-stage in world news. As my sincere interest in the growth of Islam in America intensified, I began to discuss, dialogue, and then debate Muslim leaders throughout the world from an Arab Christian's view of Islam. So far, I have had the privilege of participating in over 20 debates and discussions on every continent plus T.V. and radio. "Islam Revealed" was released in 1988 and is now in its 8th printing. The True Furqan is now in its third printing in the three years it has been published. It is the only book which challenges the Quran in substance, style, language and contents. "The True Furqan" can be located on or

    This is my analysis of the Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020! Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?

    1. Terminate America's freedom of speech by replacing it with hate crime bills state-wide and nation-wide.

    2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities to promote Islam as the original African-American's religion while Christianity is for the whites! Strange enough, no one tells the African-Americans that it was the Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves, neither the fact that in Arabic the word for black and slave is the same, "Abed."

    3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.

    4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office for favorable legislation to Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.

    5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the internet by buying the corporations or a controlling stock.

    6. Yield to the fear of imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America - the black gold. America's economy depends on oil, (1000 products are derived from oil), so does its personal and industrial transportation and manufacturing -41% comes from the Middle East.

    7. Yell, "foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran" anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.

    8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions, get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way. Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America?

    9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:

    a. Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961)

    b. No birth control whatsoever - every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.

    c. Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years - since one cannot have the Muslim legal permission to marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.

    d. Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2000 released inmates have joined Al Qaida world-wide). Only a few have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil. So far - sleeping cells!

    10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are 300 exclusively Muslim schools with loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution.

    11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish "Centers for Islamic studies" with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher education institutions.

    12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, not the truth, which is Islam hijacked the terrorists. Furthermore in January of 2002, Saudi Arabia's Embassy in Washington mailed 4500 packets of the Quran, videos, promoting Islam to America's high schools--free. They would never allow us to reciprocate.

    13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards the Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.

    14. Nullify America's sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls. (We have experienced this too often since 9-11.)

    15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not American's justice system.

    16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S. but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.

    17. Raise interest in Islam on America's campuses by insisting that freshman take at least one course on Islam. Be sure that the writer is a bonafide American, Christian, scholarly and able to cover up the violence in the Quran and express the peaceful, spiritual and religious aspect only.

    18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media of their visibility.

    19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.

    20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the US by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.

    * Jerusalem was held by Jordan from 1948 when it attacked Israel until 1967, when it again attacked Israel.

    Dr. Anis Shorrosh, D.Min, D.Phil, and a member of Oxford Society of Scholars, has traveled in 76 countries. He is a Palestinian Arab Christian American, who is an author, lecturer and producer of TV documentaries. He is author of the best-seller "Islam Revealed" and his tenth book - "Islam: A Threat or a Challenge." - was published in the spring, 2003.

    Labels: , , , ,

    "How Sarah Palin Won My Vote October 22 2008"

    Sarah Palin connects with real women. Find out below why told by a regular working mom.

    Be proud, be strong, be Sarah Palin.

    Palin Hate Continues...

    Hockey player injured... Media says... "damn that Sarah Palin"... it's all HER fault!

    Even though the player Manny Legacy said it had nothing to do with Sarah Palin, but that it was the fault of a team official who moved the carpet as he was stepping on it.

    "She's been pretty good for our game," Legace said. "I'm starting to like her more and more."

    Former Clinton Adviser Warns Voters About Obama's Socialism

    Former Bill Clinton adviser Dick Morris gives Americans one final warning about Barack Obama.

    "If Obama wins and takes a solidly and overwhelmingly Democratic Congress with him — including a filibuster-proof Senate — we will have to entrust our system of private ownership, limited government and free enterprise to the tender mercy of the left.

    But the newly empowered liberals will not have to breach the walls of the private sector, justifying each new intrusion by argument and logic. Rather, they will already be inside the gates, invited there to save these institutions from their own history of greed and mismanagement.

    Will the left simply leave government there, effectively converting our private enterprise system, where government absorbs about a third of our GDP into a social democracy, a la Europe, where the public sector accounts for almost half of the economy?"

    "World Crisis?"... is that the "Change" You are Voting For?

    Vice Presidential candidate Senator Joe Biden says if you vote for (and elect) Obama, you are voting for a "international crisis"... in fact he guarantees it... "mark my words".

    America cannot afford "change" that includes the guarantee of a "world crisis" included in the pricetag.
    Notice the self serving Senator Biden doesn't say that America will be challeneged... just that "this young inexperienced new President will be challenged" (the way JFK was).... meaning a direct threat to the US. If Obama is elected we will all be challenged.. in more ways than one.
    America needs a man with at least the military experience of a "JFK" or more right now, ... America needs John McCain.

    Great Americans

    A look at some historically great Americans.... Barack Obama doesn't qualify... "he has been weighed, he has been measured and he has been found wanting."
    hattip to Okie Campaigns

    Labels: ,

    13 Obama Staffers Caught In Ohio Voter Fraud Scheme

    NY Post- Thirteen campaign workers for Barack Obama yesterday yanked their voter registrations and ballots in Ohio after being warned by a prosecutor that temporary residents can't vote in the battleground state.

    A dozen staffers - including Obama Ohio spokeswoman Olivia Alair and James Cadogan, who recently joined Team Obama - signed a form letter asking the Franklin County elections board to pull their names from the rolls.

    The letter - a copy of which was obtained by, a Fox News affiliate - came a day after prosecutor Ron O'Brien publicly urged out-of-state campaign workers for both Obama and John McCain to "examine your conscience" before the elections board beings begins opening absentee ballots today.

    Earlier in the week, O'Brien spoke with lawyers for both camps and urged them to make sure their staffs met permanent-residency rules, or face possible felony charges.

    Also pulling his ballot yesterday was Hofstra University grad Jake Smith, an Obama volunteer who had voted in Knox County, Ohio.

    On Thursday, O'Brien cut a deal with 13 out-of-staters, including four from New York, who tossed out their already-cast ballots and admitted they didn't meet residency requirements.

    Labels: , ,

    Obama's Abuse of Power Begins Before Election

    Now we are learning that when the Obama campaign smeared Joe the Plumber, the information came from Joe's private records which were illegally accessed via official state government computers.

    "It's outrageous to see how quickly Barack Obama's allies would abuse government power in an attempt to smear a private citizen who dared to ask a legitimate question."- Paul Lindsay

    This is just a sample of what Americans are in for if Barack Obama is elected President. Ask a simple straight forward question and get your background illegally accessed, get investigated and smeared publicly and possibly destroyed.

    Old school Chicago politics of personal destruction and abuse of power ladies and gentlemen.
    Brought to you by Barack Hussein "Steve" Obama... and company.