Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America

Hat-Tip to Jihadi Du Jour
From Brigette Gabriel at ACT:

Twenty-Year Plan: Islam Targets America

by Dr. Anis Shorrosh

http://www.sullivan-county.com/immigration/rob_nothink.htm

When we immigrated from Jerusalem, Jordan* in January, 1967, little did I imagine that Islam would become center-stage in world news. As my sincere interest in the growth of Islam in America intensified, I began to discuss, dialogue, and then debate Muslim leaders throughout the world from an Arab Christian's view of Islam. So far, I have had the privilege of participating in over 20 debates and discussions on every continent plus T.V. and radio. "Islam Revealed" was released in 1988 and is now in its 8th printing. The True Furqan is now in its third printing in the three years it has been published. It is the only book which challenges the Quran in substance, style, language and contents. "The True Furqan" can be located on http://www.answers-to-islam.net/ or http://www.islam-exposed.org/.

This is my analysis of the Islamic invasion of America, the agenda of Islamists and visible methods to take over America by the year 2020! Will Americans continue to sleep through this invasion as they did when we were attacked on 9/11?

1. Terminate America's freedom of speech by replacing it with hate crime bills state-wide and nation-wide.

2. Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson and other visible religious personalities to promote Islam as the original African-American's religion while Christianity is for the whites! Strange enough, no one tells the African-Americans that it was the Arab Muslims who captured them and sold them as slaves, neither the fact that in Arabic the word for black and slave is the same, "Abed."

3. Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions, debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.

4. Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office for favorable legislation to Islam and support potential sympathizers by block voting.

5. Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV, radio and the internet by buying the corporations or a controlling stock.

6. Yield to the fear of imminent shut-off of the lifeblood of America - the black gold. America's economy depends on oil, (1000 products are derived from oil), so does its personal and industrial transportation and manufacturing -41% comes from the Middle East.

7. Yell, "foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation, hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran" anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.

8. Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House, specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture of Islam. Acquire government positions, get membership in local school boards. Train Muslims as medical doctors to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical companies. Take over the computer industry. Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of Islamization in a discreet way. Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries need them more desperately than America?

9. Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:

a. Massive immigration (100,000 annually since 1961)

b. No birth control whatsoever - every baby of Muslim parents is automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion later.

c. Muslim men must marry American women and Islamize them (10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years - since one cannot have the Muslim legal permission to marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in America.

d. Convert angry, alienated black inmates and turn them into militants (so far 2000 released inmates have joined Al Qaida world-wide). Only a few have been captured in Afghanistan and on American soil. So far - sleeping cells!

10. Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1500) should be sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are 300 exclusively Muslim schools with loyalty to the Quran, not the U.S. Constitution.

11. Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to colleges and universities in America to establish "Centers for Islamic studies" with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher education institutions.

12. Let the entire world know through propaganda, speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked Islam, not the truth, which is Islam hijacked the terrorists. Furthermore in January of 2002, Saudi Arabia's Embassy in Washington mailed 4500 packets of the Quran, videos, promoting Islam to America's high schools--free. They would never allow us to reciprocate.

13. Appeal to the historically compassionate and sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards the Muslims in America who are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.

14. Nullify America's sense of security by manipulating the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports, apartment buildings and malls. (We have experienced this too often since 9-11.)

15. Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not American's justice system.

16. Open numerous charities throughout the U.S. but use the funds to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.

17. Raise interest in Islam on America's campuses by insisting that freshman take at least one course on Islam. Be sure that the writer is a bonafide American, Christian, scholarly and able to cover up the violence in the Quran and express the peaceful, spiritual and religious aspect only.

18. Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington, mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and papers by internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the faith and engender news in the media of their visibility.

19. Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are critical of Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.

20. Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the US by spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and ethic groups in America.

* Jerusalem was held by Jordan from 1948 when it attacked Israel until 1967, when it again attacked Israel.

Dr. Anis Shorrosh, D.Min, D.Phil, and a member of Oxford Society of Scholars, has traveled in 76 countries. He is a Palestinian Arab Christian American, who is an author, lecturer and producer of TV documentaries. He is author of the best-seller "Islam Revealed" and his tenth book - "Islam: A Threat or a Challenge." - was published in the spring, 2003.

War, Lies and Videotape, A Democrat Plan for Defeat

Here is your democrat party position on the war in Iraq as detailed by Senator Jihad Joe Biden as recently as October 2007...


Here is what lefty reporter Michael Ware said about the dangers of the democrat position on pulling US troops out of Iraq back in March 07.


In July of 07 while democrats were proclaiming "the war is lost", news reports from previously anti-war reporters told a different story was unfolding...


Later in July 07, Centcom reports that the surge is indeed working...


September 07, al Qaeda in Iraq being "wiped off the map"... as General Petraeus was being called a liar by democrats like Jihad Joe Biden on al Jazeera News and by Hillary Clinton in Washington...


And what are those in Iraq saying NOW in November 2007?


Summary:
Democrats said the surge wouldn't work, couldn't work, that the war was lost, that al Qaeda in Iraq was fiction or simply the result of America being there.
Democrats like Jihad Joe Biden said that the standing up of the Iraqi military is impossible and that nobody believes that it will ever happen.
Well it did happen and yet democrats are still trying to cling to that last sliver of possible defeat even in the face of total victory by the US and Iraq against al Qaeda and Iranian 'insurgents'.
On September 11th 2007 during the Petraeus Report hearings, while Hillary Clinton was calling General Petraus a liar, Joe Biden was quoted on Al Jazeera...
"He (US Senator Joe Biden) said the "surge" strategy could not succeed as national Iraqi leaders were not committed to reconciliation between sectarian and ethnic groups." "...it's time to stop the surge and bring the troops home."

What does YOUR democrat party think about Jihad Joe Biden?



I have documented the success of the surge and the defeat of al Qaeda along with the Mahdr Army story including the rise and fall of the so-called civil war as detailed by Research Professor Engram at Back Talk, and even the main stream media is now forced to admit that democrats were totally wrong about Iraq. Democrats now have no where to go but to cling to that last hope of defeat for America in Iraq even as US troops are in fact beginning to draw down and the Iraqi forces take control of their country.

From the democrat debate on CNN last night Bill Richardson (D) NM said "the surge isn't working".
No Bill, the surge has already 'worked'... film at 11:oo
-red

General Lies and Power?

Credit to REDSTATE blog for coming up with this...

IF MOVEON.ORG had only been around 65 years ago...


UPDATE: 9/15/07- Moved this over from "Democrats For Jihad" comments section...

Anonymous said...

Hi,

Thought this news might be of some interest to your readers:

NEW moveon.org TV ad coming out on Monday Sept 17th...basically calling President Bush a traitor.

Catch it here:
MoveOn.org TV Ad


Great Response to General Betray Us Ad:
General Betray Us


Have a great weekend!
(Steve)

Educating the Uneducatable

Below is an excellent post by registered Democrat, left of center research professor and concerned American "Engram" over at the Back-Talk blog.
I suggest anyone who thinks that I represent an uneducated, hateful, unfair or unsubstantiated representation of the liberal view on Iraq or of the current situation in Iraq, by all means read Engram's work. He is no rightwing pundit or puppet of the Bush administration by any measure but clearly understands what is up, what is true and what is happening and goes to great pains to check his facts and set the record straight.

I believe however, that the left has NO INTEREST in facts, what is up, what is true or what is really happening in Iraq. Their ONLY INTEREST is getting Bush un-elected ASAP and to hell with everything else. (so prove me wrong)

Please To Enjoy...
DEBATING THE PURPOSE OF THE SURGE: By Engram at Back-Talk

Here is John Kerry at the Huffington Post echoing a standard left talking point about the troop surge in Iraq:

The Escalation Didn't Work

The escalation failed to do the one and only thing it was supposed to do. The entire Iraq policy of George W. Bush has failed since the fall of Saddam Hussein's statue in Baghdad. No amount of parsing or spinning can change those simple facts: the escalation is and was the wrong answer.
...
A political solution in Iraq cannot come about without a clear deadline on where our troops will be pulling out. Only Iraqis can end this civil war, and they aren't - and won't be - making any progress with an open-ended, massive presence by our military in their country.
...
And by the way -- go read all of the statements at the time about the "reason" for the escalation - it was to buy political breathing room for Iraqis to compromise. Period. It hasn't happened.

OK, I will go read all the statements about the reason for the troop surge because I sincerely doubt that John Kerry did.

George Will, who is ordinarily capable of formulating an independent thought, neglects to do so in his very similar assessment of the situation:

By Bush's Own Standard, Surge Has Failed

Those who today stridently insist that the surge has succeeded also say they are especially supportive of the president, Petraeus and the military generally. But at the beginning of the surge, both Petraeus and the president defined success in a way that took the achievement of success out of America's hands.

The purpose of the surge, they said, is to buy time -- "breathing space," the president says -- for Iraqi political reconciliation. Because progress toward that has been negligible, there is no satisfactory answer to this question: What is the U.S. military mission in Iraq?

According to this oft-repeated "analysis," the only purpose of the surge was to allow the Iraqi government time to get their political act together. If so, then if we take John Kerry's advice to "...go read all of the statements at the time about the 'reason' for the escalation," we'll discover that this is an accurate way to portray the situation.

George Bush explained the rationale for the troop surge to the American people in a speech to the nation on January 10, 2007. If John Kerry and George Will (and legions of like-minded left-wing commentators) are right, then one should be able read that speech and easily extract the message that the only purpose of the troop surge was to give Iraqi politicians some breathing space. Right? Let's take a look.

Bush's speech can be found here. For starters, it is remarkable in that it displays an understanding of some most fundamental points about what has happened in Iraq over the last year and a half. Most people are unaware of these basic points, and they find Bush to be unpersuasive, but these are the facts:

When I addressed you just over a year ago, nearly 12 million Iraqis had cast their ballots for a unified and democratic nation. The elections of 2005 were a stunning achievement. We thought that these elections would bring the Iraqis together, and that as we trained Iraqi security forces we could accomplish our mission with fewer American troops.

But in 2006, the opposite happened. The violence in Iraq -- particularly in Baghdad -- overwhelmed the political gains the Iraqis had made. Al Qaeda terrorists and Sunni insurgents recognized the mortal danger that Iraq's elections posed for their cause, and they responded with outrageous acts of murder aimed at innocent Iraqis. They blew up one of the holiest shrines in Shia Islam -- the Golden Mosque of Samarra -- in a calculated effort to provoke Iraq's Shia population to retaliate. Their strategy worked. Radical Shia elements, some supported by Iran, formed death squads. And the result was a vicious cycle of sectarian violence that continues today.

All evidence -- evidence that I have repeatedly summarized in excruciating detail -- supports this synopsis of progress (and lack thereof) in Iraq. The setback in Iraq was sudden. And the "strategy" Bush refers to is al Qaeda's strategy, one that was conceived by Zarqawi (and one that troop-withdrawal advocates never mention for some odd reason).

In his speech, Bush does, indeed, urge the Iraqis to make political progress and notes that now (i.e., during the troop surge) is the time for them do it:

I've made it clear to the Prime Minister and Iraq's other leaders that America's commitment is not open-ended. If the Iraqi government does not follow through on its promises, it will lose the support of the American people -- and it will lose the support of the Iraqi people. Now is the time to act. The Prime Minister understands this.

My point is not that Kerry and Will are wrong to suggest that, according to Bush, one purpose of the troop surge was to give Iraqi politicians the breathing space they need to achieve a political consensus (and that escalating sectarian violence was making that impossible). My point is that Kerry and Will and legions of like-minded left-wing commentators are wrong to suggest that this was the primary purpose of the troop surge. In truth, it was one stated purpose, and it was secondary to another, more important, purpose. Bush was crystal clear about the primary purpose of the troop surge, and he devoted a lot more time to that issue than to the "political reconciliation" issue (so I'm not sure how Kerry and Will missed it):

As we make these changes, we will continue to pursue al Qaeda and foreign fighters. Al Qaeda is still active in Iraq. Its home base is Anbar Province. Al Qaeda has helped make Anbar the most violent area of Iraq outside the capital. A captured al Qaeda document describes the terrorists' plan to infiltrate and seize control of the province. This would bring al Qaeda closer to its goals of taking down Iraq's democracy, building a radical Islamic empire, and launching new attacks on the United States at home and abroad.

Our military forces in Anbar are killing and capturing al Qaeda leaders, and they are protecting the local population. Recently, local tribal leaders have begun to show their willingness to take on al Qaeda. And as a result, our commanders believe we have an opportunity to deal a serious blow to the terrorists. So I have given orders to increase American forces in Anbar Province by 4,000 troops. These troops will work with Iraqi and tribal forces to keep up the pressure on the terrorists. America's men and women in uniform took away al Qaeda's safe haven in Afghanistan -- and we will not allow them to re-establish it in Iraq.

If you think that handing al Qaeda a victory right now is the correct thing to do because the Iraqis cannot seem to get their act together, then come right out and say so. John Kerry and George Will are not bold enough to do that. That's why they do what Democrats (and some Republicans) have done from the very beginning: completely ignore the issue of al Qaeda in Iraq, as if it is so utterly inconsequential that you can write an entire column on the subject without even bringing up its name. I have been highlighting this absurd phenomenon (which I long ago dubbed the "eerie code of silence") for many months now. I am simply aghast that no one else seems to notice this elephant in the room. The reason why opponents of the war in Iraq maintain their eerie code of silence about al Qaeda in Iraq is because their position instantly self-destructs if the issue is raised. That is, if you utter the words "al Qaeda" when advocating our quick withdrawal from Iraq, you are suddenly forced to choose between these two options:

1. deny that al Qaeda in Iraq exists (or deny that it is a major force)

2. accept that al Qaeda does exist and is a major force there, but deny that withdrawing from Iraq now would be tantamount to surrendering to the very terrorist organization that attacked us on 9/11

Well, which is it? John Kerry and George Will don't say. I wouldn't either if I were in their shoes. Unlike them, the incomparable Charles Krauthammer does not adopt the eerie code of silence:

The American people are not antiwar. They are anti-losing. Which means they are also anti-drift. Adrift is where we were during most of 2006 -- the annus horribilis initiated by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's bringing down the Golden Mosque in Samarra -- until the new counterinsurgency strategy of 2007 (the "surge") reversed the trajectory of the war.
...
Having poisoned one country and been expelled from it (Afghanistan), al-Qaeda seized upon post-Hussein instability to establish itself in the very heart of the Arab Middle East -- Sunni Iraq. Yet now, in front of all the world, Iraq's Sunnis are, to use the biblical phrase, vomiting out al-Qaeda. This is a defeat and humiliation in the extreme -- an Arab Muslim population rejecting al-Qaeda so violently that it allies itself in battle with the infidel, the foreigner, the occupier.

Just carrying this battle to its successful conclusion -- independent of its larger effect of helping stabilize Iraq -- is justification enough for the surge. The turning of Sunni Iraq against al-Qaeda is a signal event in the war on terrorism. Petraeus's plan is to be allowed to see it through.

It's hard to argue with that, which is why people like Kerry and Will don't even try.

Iraqi's Treating U.S. as LIBERATORS

From Flopping Aces:
ANBAR Province in Iraq presented President Bush with a letter dedicating their success against Al Qaeda to the victims of the 9/11/2001 attacks on the WTC and US pentagon.
The letter doesn't call the US occupiers, doesn't demand U.S. withdrawal, doesn't say that Al Qaeda is only in Iraq because US soldiers are in Iraq and doesn't call for an investigation into why Bush lied about Saddam's WMD's.
It says thank you, they remember the tragedy of 9/11 and are saddened by America's loss.

This flies in the face of Democrats and liberals alike who have been claiming that Americans are killing innocent Iraqi's and not winning the hearts and minds as well as their claims that Al Qaeda has nothing to do with Iraq.
Of course this does not fit the main stream media's template for a US defeat in Iraq either, so naturally it has gone virtually unreported.

Democrats should be forced to give their "we can't win" speech to the folks in Anbar and directly to the troops in the field, instead of from hiding in their Ivory towers... if that were the case, I suspect we would be hearing a different tune.

UPDATE: 09/12/07 The price of freedom is high, very high...others must now step forward to show the Jihadi's that there are more Iraqi's against them than there are Iraq'is willing to let them take their country from them.
The locals in this area have seen violence before and plenty of it, no doubt about that. The murder of their leader should only strengthen their resolve and bring on the wrath of the US forces in cooperation with local Sunni's. The Anbar province area has been LOST by the Jihadists and it is going to stay that way.

UPDATE #2: 09/13/07 Al Qaeda Suffers Heavy Losses north of Baghdad as US troops in cooperation with local Iraqi's continue to kill and capture remaining groups and scattered elements as further evidence the surge is working as planned.
-red

Democrat(s) For Jihad... Of The Day

Today we have co-winners... or two losers depending on your view.

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, ...come on down... you are today's winners of, "Democrat For Jihad... Of The Day"!
Presidential candidate Barack Obama called for an immediate withdrawal of all troops from Iraq ending in 2008... and Hillary Clinton called the highly decorated 4 Star General David Patraeus in charge of all operations in Iraq, a liar by saying his testimony (under oath) required the "suspension of disbelief".

Disclaimer for Oklahoma Lefty:
Not ALL liberals, progressives and Democrats support the Jihadi's over Bush's troops, HOWEVER ... 61% (thanks dave) of Democrat VOTERS (combined) believe Bush was involved in the 9/11 attacks (or not sure), so indeed Democrats who support a US victory in Iraq are in the silent minority. Ultimately, those silent so-called "good liberals" that don't agree with the extreme far left, also don't matter since they are by definition..."silent".

I challenge these "good liberals" and responsible Democrats to call out and dispute these anti-American radical extremists that have hi-jacked what was once a great and proud political party... if you don't, then all of my so-called generalizations are not generalizations at all, but in fact the truth. It's sort-of like with the silent majority of good Muslims... by their silence they support the extremists... except no-one is threatening to kill good liberals for speaking out.

Dishonorable Mention: Warning label required; Libertarian wacko (posing as a Republican) Ron Paul is for the Jihadists, believes Bush was behind 9/11 and gets exposed by Bill O'Reilly. (thanks to Political Vindication)
-red

Democrat For Jihad ...Of The Day

Today's "Democrat For Jihad"... Joe Biden.



From Al Jazeera ..."It's time to stop the surge and bring the troops home"...(before we mess around and win this thing) Senator Joseph Biden (D) presidential candidate. When you get quoted on Al Jazeera in opposition to your own country during a time of war... you deserve the 'prize'.


Today's Runner up (loser again):
Senator John Kerry (D) MA (served in Vietnam) slipped up today and admitted that Al Qaeda is actually in Iraq when he said " "it's obvious that the tribal leaders simply got tired of their women, wives and daughters getting raped and murdered by Al Qaeda".
Senator Kerry (D) (60's war protester/threw away medals) was questioning 4-star General David Petraeus during the Iraq report hearings.
The point Senator Kerry (D) (picture is in the communist museum in Vietnam) was trying to make was that the surge is succeeding only because of Iraqi's taking matters into their own hands due to the U.S. military being unable to do the job. We all are well aware that Senator Kerry (claimed US military was terrorizing innocent Iraqi women and children in the middle of the night) believes it is the Americans who are doing the raping and murdering and that Al Qaeda has nothing to do with Iraq... remember "we took our eye off of the ball" in Afghanistan according to Senator Kerry (D) (married rich widow Teresa Heinz) ($).

Better luck tomorrow John(s).

Dishonorable Mentions: Robert Wexler (D) FL provided his local wacko voters with reason to keep him around by first insulting and then getting "schooled" by General Petraeus... while trying to use the (accidental non-combat) deaths of 9 soldiers today as an example against the highly decorated General and the war effort.
And Republican John Warner (R) who seems to have let the pressure from Democrats get to him.

General Betray-us or Liberals Betray U.S.?

For those so inclined to question the numbers or the Iraq Status Report from General David Petraeus, read what Engram over at "Back Talk" blog has put together.
He is a Professor at a research University who is admittedly left of center, but takes a more objective look at politics and of course is therefore considered an extreme right-winger by his peers.

Engram writes; "If Durbin or Walker have a problem with the statistics, they should verify those statistics for themselves. Reflexively doubting Petraeus and the U.S. military without backing up your skepticism is just indulging yourself in egocentric grandstanding. It might feel good, but it's not a useful endeavor".

Great stuff! Which by the way, Prof Engram did verify the statistics and posted them for all to see. If a college professor can verify statistical claims in a government report in his spare time, you would think a US Senator could....or not. But that wouldn't satisfy the liberal ego or make liberal contributors "feel good" in the checkbook department.

BTW, Who do Americans trust most on Iraq by a large margin?
A: Military leaders?
B: Congress?
C: Bush?
D: Daily KOS?
E: The Media
F: Nobody.
Hint; It's not B, C , D, E or F

To those who are calling Gen. Petraeus a liar and names like "General Betrayus" before he has even delivered HIS report, (not Bush's report as some would have you believe) I say you are treasonous, aiding and abetting the enemy and a are merely a liar yourself... at best.

If you think we should let people like moveon.org, the Daily Kos and Dick Durbin and other Democrats get away with saying things about our military that are designed to destroy the credibility of the entire military as well as one man (who should be regarded by all Americans as a HERO), without a shred of evidence, for mere political gain, YOU would be wrong, my friends.

So, Dick Durbin YOU are the official Red Stater "Democrat for Jihad" Of The Day !
For essentially calling a highly respected 4star General, direct from the war theatre, in full dress uniform, about to go under oath, ...a liar, before that general has even uttered a word.
Despicable Disgusting Democrats.


NEW: The "Okie for Jihad" ...Of The Day award goes to OKIE FUNK for this horrible, pathetic, vile post.
WAR PIGS: (video from okie funk)
"President George Bush and his lapdog, General David Petraeus, are despicable liars and warmongers who will spin and distort information this week in order to continue the long and gruesome Iraq occupation indefinitely. The blood of thousands of innocent people is on their hands, true, but national Democrats (the fraidycrats) will fail to speak up in enough numbers as well. The Democrats could stop this occupation, but they will refuse to do so because of political expediency, even though a majority of Americans want it to come to an end. Corporate media reporters—the elite, beltway “infotainers"-will let us down again by serving as stenographers for these two morally-challenged liars."

Note: Okie Funk was voted "Best Political Blog (in Oklahoma) for 2006" and is currently nominated for "Best Overall Blog" and "Best Political Blog" again in 2007... pathetic isn't it?


And yet some think it is Red Stater that needs to tone it down?

Surge Ends Civil War Talk

Here is another sure sign that the surge is not only working, but working better than expected.
What two words have you not heard used lately when listening to the news media or the Democrat talking points (same thing)?

We have heard from just about everyone who has visited the war and also from those fighting in theater that the SURGE IS WORKING, violence is down significantly and Iraqi's are working WITH U.S. troops to find Al Qaeda and Iranian Islamic radicals as well as fighting them on their own.... but no mention of the so-called "civil war" that the American news media and Democrat party (same thing) were so fond of mentioning every day - 50x per day, for the past year or longer.

This leaves me wondering... how long after Iraq is stable and a friend to the US can the Democrats and news media (same thing) hold on to their dream of civil war and American DEFEAT?

Osama Video Expected, Democrats Scramble

Not to be outdone by Fred Thompson's big announcement on the Tonight Show, Barahma Osama, errrr Binlama Obama, uhhhh... Osamabama mama, uhhh I mean Osama Bin Laden is expected to release a new video announcing his candidacy for President of the United States.
"Since I already have the full support of the entire Democrat party, I figured I might as well enter the presidential race now rather than waiting" Bin Laden reportedly said to a handful of hungry followers at an impromptu rally in a cave somewhere in the mountains near the Afghanistan border today. "Bring on that two bit "B" list Hollywood actor and his trophy wife", "that adulterer Mayor from NY and that infidel Mormon too"... "I will slaughter them all...(at the polls of course)".

Admittedly there are problems to work out with citizenship and other issues but Democrats are confident those problems can be worked out.
"We are going to pass legislation that will allow all people to vote and run for President of this great country no matter where they live or what their beliefs are" said Speaker of the House Nancy Peloci (D) CA. "It's a big tent" according to Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (D) NV "and it's a great day when our sworn enemies are comfortable enough to run for political office and become a part of the process. We are just proud to be a part of it and look forward to sitting down and discussing how we can help."

Reid also said this should signal the end of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan or the so-called "war on terror". "With Osama in the presidential race, I don't see any way that Bush and Cheney can continue this illegal war against a candidate for President, I mean that is surely against the Constitution and all that this country was founded on. We expect the war to be over within 24 hours of the release of Mr. Laden's new video and announcement of his candidacy for President of the United States".

Reid added "God bles,....errrr excuse me,... Allah bless America".

Bin Laden is expected to select former Muslim Barack Obama as his VP creating the "Osama-bama in 08" ticket.
In other news, Bin Laden said Hillary Clinton will be executed along with her unfaithful adulterer husband following the election according to Islamic law. All other candidates will announce their conversion to Islam and their new Muslim names within 1 week or will be executed according to Islamic law. All homosexuals will be rounded up and executed according to Islamic law. All others will have a reasonable amount of time to convert to Islam or be executed according to Islamic law.


-red

"Democrat For Jihad" ...of the Day

Democratic Presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich is in Syria bashing Bush and refuses to visit the American troops in Iraq who are involved in what he calls an "illegal war".
Way to go Dennis, you are the "Democrat for Jihad" of the day!





Coming in second place is Senator Chuck Schumer (D) NY who said that the surge is working... in spite of the US military, NOT due to the US military. The same people who have been calling for Iraqi's to stand up to Al Qaeda are now condemning the fact that Iraqi's are standing up to the terrorists and working WITH US troops in the process.

Better luck next time Senator Schumer, I'm sure you'll try harder.
-red

Liberal Logic And Other Lunacy

From Todd Anthony over at Flopping Aces...

"Like undoubtedly many of the RealClearPolitics readers, I like to peruse the JihadWatch.org website, hosted by noted author Robert Spencer. Here, Spencer posts countless topics per day regarding atrocities, murders, hate-crimes, etc perpetrated by Islamists.

I thought a fairly brief essay was in order to discuss the pressure “civil rights” groups like CAIR (Council for American-Islamic Relations) and the IAC (Iranian-American Council) have placed on corporations, universities, and other sponsors. Here this pressure is to block JihadWatch as a hate-speech site on their servers, as well as excoriate Spencer and his site for espousing hate. Also, the intention of this essay is to rebuke the Left, who have embraced dhimmitude, for their hypocritical stance towards First Amendment rights.

I was inspired by a well-written article (White Jihadists) from Erik Rush, a contributor of social commentary to numerous print and online publications, and a Staff Writer for the New Media Alliance, Inc., and is acting Associate Editor and Publisher of TheRealityCheck.org.

We’ve heard for years now that President Bush, Vice President Cheney and his hoards of neocons have used stormtrooper-like tactics to usurp the Constitution, thus creating a police-state (I can’t make this stuff up). “Respected” media institutions like the New York Times, in a outright act of sedition, exposed a secret NSA electronic wiretapping program in 2005.

Yet, in one of the most frightening forms of legislation ever witnessed, we’ve seen the Democrats attempt to stifle free speech with HR 192, prepared for presentation to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security. This bill, essentially, would stifle free RELIGIOUS speech. According to Brad Dacus, as cited in World News Daily, “the misuse of "hate crimes" laws that give those claiming "sexual orientation" or "gender identity" discrimination special legal rights, pointing out that such a maneuver recently was used, as WND has reported, by the Hindu American Foundation to label a long list of Christian ministry websites who promote Christian beliefs and offer the choice of those beliefs to those involved in other religions as "hate speech."

Reverend Louis Sheldon of the Traditional Values Coalition states the following, “(this bill is) an attempt by the ultra liberals and the homosexuals to force Americans to accept homosexuality and gender disturbance as equal to God's Created Order of heterosexuality.

This while Muslims, treated with kid gloves in this country by the Politically Correct Left, have practiced Free Speech endlessly with their attacks against Christians and Jews.

Furthermore, the Liberals, notably Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein, have attempted to resurrect a piece of legislation that would require radio stations to broadcast liberal and conservative talk radio evenly. This legislation is overwhelmingly political in nature, as efforts to revive liberal radio ventures like Air American have ended in abject failure on multiple occasions.

It’s telling that groups like MoveOn.org have staged a full frontal attack on people like Congressman Brian Baird. For those of you who don’t know, Baird is a Democrat, who while opposed to the Iraq War, visited Iraq and noted the successes of the surge. Upon return, Baird instructed the masses that it would be wise to exercise restraint and allow the surge time for complete success.

The Daily Kos has jumped in on the action, castigating, often maliciously and obscenely, Democrats like Baird and others who share his beliefs. Ironically, it is this form of subjugation to stifle dissent that has shown the Left’s true colors.

It’s pretty telling, the party that advocates the rights of the people, actually advocates the rights of a FEW people. It’s obscene how destructive this Democratic party has become; can anyone see our country awash in flames because of them?"

Democrats For Jihad, join now and avoid the Rush (Limbaugh that is).

Quote Of The Day

"How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin... And how do you tell an anti-communist?
It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin". - Ronald Reagan

UPDATED: How do you tell a Jihadist? Well, it's someone who reads the Koran (Qur'an) and uses it to slaughter people. And how do you tell an anti-Jihadist?
Well, ...you won't find one in the new Democrat party, that's for sure.