Democrat(s) For Jihad... Of The Day
Today we have co-winners... or two losers depending on your view.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, ...come on down... you are today's winners of, "Democrat For Jihad... Of The Day"!
Presidential candidate Barack Obama called for an immediate withdrawal of all troops from Iraq ending in 2008... and Hillary Clinton called the highly decorated 4 Star General David Patraeus in charge of all operations in Iraq, a liar by saying his testimony (under oath) required the "suspension of disbelief".
Disclaimer for Oklahoma Lefty:
Not ALL liberals, progressives and Democrats support the Jihadi's over Bush's troops, HOWEVER ... 61% (thanks dave) of Democrat VOTERS (combined) believe Bush was involved in the 9/11 attacks (or not sure), so indeed Democrats who support a US victory in Iraq are in the silent minority. Ultimately, those silent so-called "good liberals" that don't agree with the extreme far left, also don't matter since they are by definition..."silent".
I challenge these "good liberals" and responsible Democrats to call out and dispute these anti-American radical extremists that have hi-jacked what was once a great and proud political party... if you don't, then all of my so-called generalizations are not generalizations at all, but in fact the truth. It's sort-of like with the silent majority of good Muslims... by their silence they support the extremists... except no-one is threatening to kill good liberals for speaking out.
Dishonorable Mention: Warning label required; Libertarian wacko (posing as a Republican) Ron Paul is for the Jihadists, believes Bush was behind 9/11 and gets exposed by Bill O'Reilly. (thanks to Political Vindication)
-red
Labels: Democrats For Jihad, Hillary, Obama, YOU?
posted by RD at 5:24 PM
AOL Sports Hottest Athlete
8 Comments:
Thank you for the disclaimer there Red. That wasn't so hard now was it?
Where did you get the 70% of Democrats believe that Bush was involved with 9/11? That's just crazy sounding.
corrected... not 70%, you're right thats just insane crazy talk... it's 61%.
In the poll (link added to post)
26% of all Democrats believe Bush attacked America on 9/11...35% of all Democrats are "not sure" if Bush attacked America, (but obviously believe it is possible).
Thus, 61% of Democrats believe or are not sure that Bush was behind the 9/11 attacks on the WTC and pentagon... this doesn't even include the democrats claiming to be libertarians and/or republicans.
call me crazy but I stand by my claim that the large majority of Democrats and even LARGER majority of liberals are a bunch of tin-foil-hat wearing, moonbat, wacko's who SUPPORT the JIHAD.
And THAT my friend is treason, like it or not.
I never understood why the Secret Service never whisked Bush out of that school in Sarasota on the morning of 9/11. How did they know a plane wasn't heading smack dab for the school, since it was published in the media that he was going to be there that day. Just wonderin' ...
Andrew @ RedDirtReport.com
...based on your comments andrew, there are a lot of things you have "never understood"... like reality for instance.
Here's something you might consider looking into...
Bush Derangement Disorder.
Seriously.
Did this inability to understand (fact from fiction) begin following the 2000 elections or have you always suffered from it?
just wonderin'...
Hey Red...that links goes to a story with "Key Iraqi Sunni tribal leader killed: police" as the headline. I didn't see any mention of the poll data in there. FYI.
thanks dave, fixed it. I had linked to Reuters main page and they changed the story at the top...
The 61% is a combined number 35% believe BUSH had prior knowledge of the 9/11 attacks and did nothing and 26% weren't sure if BUSH was involved in the attacks.
This didn't include the 100% of Ron Paulbots that think Bush was involved.
But the point is that Nate was dead wrong when he said that the majority of liberals are FOR a US Victory.
Nobody that believes Bush was behind the attacks is for Bush to be victorious in the so-called illegal, immoral war base on lies.
Don't even go there.
-red
where is your information in regards to Ron Paul? He has never once voted for increased taxes or any laws that would seize private property and restrict individual freedoms.
A link to a credible source would be nice....not just something spewed from the mouth of bill o'.
paulron, I said "Warning label required; Libertarian wacko (posing as a Republican) Ron Paul is for the Jihadists, believes Bush was behind 9/11 and gets exposed by Bill O'Reilly".
Where in there did I claim he was for higher taxes or against private property ownership?
If you are referring to the image...it's not mine but only says Ron Paul "MAY cater..." if you have issues with that statement I suggest you take it up with political vindication.
Speaking of PV, did you even click on the link and read the story?
What do you ronbots do, search for "ronpaulbots and other moonbats" on google and go into archives and start a fight? This post was over a month ago...where ya' been?
BTW- I notice you had no problems with the "wacko Libertarian" and 9/11 "Truthers" parts? hmmmm why is that.
-red
Post a Comment
<< Home