Proving The Left Wrong (again)

This one goes out to all the lib's who like to claim I never criticize Republicans and only see the bad in Liberals.
I have posted on many of my disagreements with Bush and numerous Republicans in the past, but liberals still like to accuse me of wearing blinders and only seeing the good side of Republican politicians and only the bad in Democrats. (they don't actually read conservative opinions, they just assume)
They don't bother to notice the number of times I have posted the Will Rogers (D) OK quote that goes something like...
"you don't have to be around politics very long to realize that each party is worse than the other"

So lets get to it...
Bush is wrong on the borders and illegal immigration. That's right, Bush is wrong. Flat wrong, dead wrong, just plain wrong. Conservatives want the immigration laws enforced BEFORE they try to come up with a comprehensive plan for the 12-20 million illegal aliens.
Chuck Hagel needs to retire. Good riddance, buh-bye.
Airport sexpot Craig in Idaho needs to resign immediately if not sooner. (wide stance or not)
Arlen Specter should resign also. ASAP...buh-bye.
Bush and Republicans are wrong for not making English the official language.
Republicans in general were wrong for not building the fence and securing the borders as promised.
Republicans are wrong for not protecting marriage (1man+1woman), wrong for not rounding up illegals, wrong for not making the tax cuts permanent when they had the chance.
Bush was wrong to leave Clinton leftovers in positions of power (like the CIA)
Bush was wrong to not prosecute Sandy Berger for stuffing secret documents down his pants and stealing them to protect BJ Clinton.
Bush was wrong for not prosecuting the NY Times and whichever Democrat leaked the information about our being able to listen to Osama Bin Laden's cell phone... which of course was never used again.
Bush is wrong for spending like a drunken Democrat on crack.
Republicans were wrong for not fixing Social Security (privatization) when they had the chance.
McCain was wrong about the borders and too soft on "enemy combatants".
Gulianni is wrong about abortion and looks a little too much like Mr. Magoo.
Ron Paul possibly should be locked up and tested for insanity.
Condi Rice is too polite and nice.
Mitt Romney is too slick, tan, stiff and pre-programmed.
Laura Bush is short and too nice.
And finally, Cheney was wrong for not taking Kerry, Gore, Edwards, Kucinich, Clark and Clinton (either one) hunting instead of his best friend.

Now on the Democrat side...
Joe Liberman is a great American (even though I disagree with him on several issues)
John F Kennedy was a great American (even though I disagreed with him on several issues)
Zell Miller is a Democrat that I respect and could possibly supported and voted for under the right conditions.
John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Algore, Madeline Albright, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Wilson and General Wesley Clark had it right about Saddam (before they all got a bad case of Bush Derangement Disorder and changed their story 180 degrees)

There ya' go libs, now shut up about me not criticizing Repubs...

Now, having said all that, my (our) choice is still to select between politicians that...
A: Ignore the threat of Islamic Jihadi's, ignore the connection between Iraq and the Islamic Jihadi's, meet and side with enemies of the United States during a time of war, blame Bush for everything (including the attacks on 9/11: 49%) and offer solutions to nothing, while promoting abortion, advocating more gun restrictions, promising to raise taxes seeking to appoint liberal judges to impose new law(s) without congress actually writing law.

Or politicians that...
B: Understand and are actively engaged in the war with radical Islamic Jihadi's, understand what a loss to those Islamic Jihadi's in Iraq would mean for Americans and the world, support the unborn, support the 2nd ammendment, protect traditional marriage, lowering taxes, promoting business and appointing judges that don't write new laws from the bench.

Politicians from BOTH sides are guilty of being human however we cannot afford to have a man (or woman) in the white house who is willing to put the country at risk in the form of blackmail resulting from a mistress, airport bathroom hanky-panky or not having sex with that woman in the back of a limo somewhere. Politicians from BOTH sides are going to have some shady deal(s) somewhere in the closet or woodpile, no one is perfect.

So, my (our) choice is
A: The politician who doesn't recognize the connection between the war in Iraq and the war with radical Islam, is pro-abortion, anti-gun and wants to raise my taxes.
B: The politician who supports a victory in Iraq because it is a victory against radical Islam, is pro-life, pro 2nd ammendment, supports border enforcement and favors lower taxes...

A: Pacifists, Socialists & Communist wannabe's
B: Warmongers, Capitalists & holier than thou Christians

Since in my opinion the war against radical Islam is the single most important issue of our lifetime... you can guess which one I'm going with and it has NOTHING to do with (R) or (D)'s, just the issues.

Now, do you wish to debate the issues one by one?
No problem.
-red