Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Do They Hate Horses Too?


In the late 1960's early 70's when many Americans discovered Sex Drugs and RockNroll others were "Seeing the USA in their Chevrolet" and falling in love with the musclecar.




Manufacturers were scrambling to make the next, fastest, baddest hotrod with the biggest engine in the smallest chassis.


But what was to become the current "liberal left" in America decided that cars were bad. California started the movement (shocking) with strict emission standards causing Mfr's to make special "CA" modifications for sales of cars in California. A shortage on supplies of gasoline (and issues in the middle east) caused gas prices to shoot up temporarily and panic set in. The left used this as a scare tactic to make Americans drive smaller, lower hp, less efficient but "cleaner" cars that would save us all tons of money on gas.

Their answer was the Ford Pinto and Chevy Vega and of course for all of us to drive foreign cars.

Their strategy worked.... for a while that is.

But Pinto's caught on fire in most accidents, Vega's rattled themselves to pieces, gas prices didn't continue to climb as some had claimed and Americans came back to bigger engines in bigger vehicles and the SUV was born.
Even sexy new retro musclecars were rolling off the assembly lines!

Almost immediately the left went on the attack. Across the land the cry went out that SUV's have gotta' go because they're causing global warming and destroying the planet.

I'll bet you a large Dr. Pepper that even if we were experiencing "global cooling" it would still be the automobile's fault... and even if suddenly the temp never changed again.... guess what, it would be the result of driving cars too much and destroying the natural ebb and flow of climate change!

So I'm wondering why the Left hates cars so much.
Is it simply gasoline (oil)?
That's the easy answer, until you ask why do they hate oil?
Is it the environment?
Again, that's the easy answer... if you don't ask any more questions, (like the left)
But, they also hate nuclear power (not in my backyard), Electricity (hydroelectric dams/lakes cause environmental damage) and even wind power (not if it obstructs MY view).

Okay, so what's left to use to heat our homes and power transportation, industry with?

Can you imagine for a second... if all the homes and businesses in America were heated with wood? (It's organic and replenishable folks) The smog would be so thick you could cut it with a knife. So that's out. No heat or A/C.
BTW- Since one single cord of wood produces as much emissions as 10 SUV's, how much does a thousand acres of burning wood in a forest fire started by lightning contribute to global warming?

Anyway, besides sitting in a cold dark (or hot) house, we could get to our cold dark jobs riding a horse I suppose...

But no, the methane gas alone would destroy the planet. Horses are bad.
We could all go to work riding our shiny new bicycles with a little bell on it. Except rubber mfg. is bad and there might be lead in the paint and there would be no iron or steel manufacturing (no oil, coal or hot enough fire), or plastic, so bikes are out.

Okay I've got it... we could all go to our cold- dark- jobs on roller skates.

(Or inline skates if you prefer) except that there wouldn't be any paved roads (no asphalt) .
Concrete can't be good for the environment either, so sidewalks are out. Forget skating.


Exercise is good, so we could all just walk to our cold (hot) dark jobs, ...except there probably wouldn't be any jobs to walk to either.

Sound's lovely doesn't it?

I'm going for a drive, ...catch ya' later.

-red
UPDATE: Thanks to an anonymous commenter, (who happens to have gotten it) it's us, people, humans, me and you that they hate and everything to do with us. Perhaps this is the answer...

Labels:

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Red-
You're premise here is correct, though methinks you haven't followed the line of thought to it's (il)logical conclusion. It's not about oil, cars (electric or otherwise), renewable energy, pollution, snail darters, DDT or any other of the plethora of environmental boogey-men or lawsuit-worthy "causes". It's about us. People.
The top of the "green" thought pyramid is this: our species is a scourge, a plague, a pox on the planet. We were supposed to have bitten the Darwinian bullet somewhere along the way, and, dang us all to heck, we screwed up and survived. What's worse, we thrived!
By way of example, a few quotes from one Paul Watson, founder of the anti-whaling group Sea Shepard Conservation Society:
 … mankind is “acting like a virus” and is harming Mother Earth. (I can just see the Army's new, post President Hillary ad, "A Virus of One".)
 “We are killing our host the planet Earth.” (Given Katrina, Rita and the Christmas Tsunami alone, I'd say she's at least pulled up even.)
 “I was once severely criticized for describing human beings as being the ‘AIDS of the Earth.’ I make no apologies for that statement.” (Fair enough. Why should you set a precedent and be the first leftist to issue an actual apology. For anything.)
 “We need vast areas of the planet where humans do not live at all and where other species are free to evolve without human interference.” (I actually kinda like this one, assuming the hunting seasons are long and bag limits large!)
 “We need to radically and intelligently reduce human populations to fewer than one billion.” (Will Jack Kevorkian be on the new papyrus One Amero bill?)
 “Sea transportation should be by sail." (Bon Voyage, pal. Write if you get work.)
 "Air transportation should be by solar powered blimps when air transportation is necessary.” (Oh, the humanity! So many snarks, so little time!)
 “We need to stop flying, stop driving cars, and jetting around on marine recreational vehicles. The Mennonites survive without cars and so can the rest of us.” (Oh, sure, great for you, but what are the 999,999,998 of us who get shunned supposed to do?)
Ultimately, this all goes straight back to the old 'Mother Earth", Gaia, '60's radical, Earth would be Nirvana if just all those nasty people would disappear environmentalist crap. Did we need to clean up our act? Certainly, and we have. But this nonsense goes WAY beyond the pale. This is hatred of one's species (which I strongly suspect is rooted in the hatred of one's self).
And that, I think, is the entire point. ALL leftist policy is based on hatred of our species, carefully disguised as concern for our species (and, of course, the exercise of sheer, naked power over others).
Does any rational human being actually believe that Kyoto would make life better for ANYONE on this planet (Al Gore excepted)? Exactly.

11:46 PM  
Blogger RD said...

YES! that's it. I left that part for you to figure out... I had to go burn some fuel off.
Maybe if they just convinced people that the right thing to do for the planet is to... go to a "termination center" and "donate" your life for the planet... they could feed the rest of the world with Soylent Green Biscuits.
("It's PEOPLE, their made from PEOPLE")

12:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Red-
I'm sooooooooo glad you dropped the Soylent Green reference. I just couldn't bring myself to do it. Thanks! and keep up the good work!
(I am, btw, Tokenokie).

2:44 PM  
Blogger RD said...

Thanks to you tokenokie for your comment... be sure to vote in my new poll.


"Ahhhhhhgggg, It's PEOPLE, ...they're made from people". Chuck Heston.

3:22 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home