Democrat Politics of Personal Destruction Predictable
1- Senator Tom Coburn asks some important legitimate questions about Obama's controversial judicial "anoint-ee" Sonia Sotomayor.
2- Dirtbag Democrats immediately respond with personal attacks based on conjecture and hearsay, not to refute any of the tough questions, but specifically designed to destroy any/all opposition.
Is this really the kind of politics we want taught in our schools and funded by our tax dollars?
2- Dirtbag Democrats immediately respond with personal attacks based on conjecture and hearsay, not to refute any of the tough questions, but specifically designed to destroy any/all opposition.
Is this really the kind of politics we want taught in our schools and funded by our tax dollars?
posted by RD at 9:07 PM
AOL Sports Hottest Athlete
26 Comments:
What was written on "okie funk" and "blue Oklahoma" -- same highly educated idiot wrote both -- were said about a private citizen, he would be hauled into court for libel. But he thinks he can say anything he wants to about Sen. Coburn if it advances the "poisoning of the well" of public opinion.
This tactic is in the Leninist, Stalinist, Goebbels, Alinsky school of telling a lie long and loud enough so that people begin to believe there's truth behind it.
I am ashamed that our tax dollars help pay this guy's salary.
My point exactly Dave. I've been dogging dr kurt for a few years now.
And he teaches blogging of all things...unbelievable really... isn't it.
shall we call for his resignation?
...from out of state might not be the strongest position from which to launch such a call... i thing the best i can do is point out his agenda, methods, hypocrisy and just how plain wrong he usually is.
I do believe that if he wishes to be a political activist that he get a job in that field and quit pretending to be an unbiased instrument of higher learning however.
-red
we have enough friends in Oklahoma though. perhaps they can contact the university and call for his resignation.
What makes you think that already hasn't been done... not that it wouldn't hurt for them to hear more than one voice.
I have asked them to look into the fact that he uses his personal Okie Funk and Blue Oklahoma blogs as primary links on his college course site... without any alternative view links. But no reply.
I think the objection needs to come from a student or an alumni to get any traction with admin.
I think Dave would be a good candidate for that. He used to attend that school.
Seriously... dave went to UCO?
I'm shocked that the troublemaker he is that he didn't challenge them on the dochoc indoctrination deal long ago... then again I don't recall dave even mentioning Okie Funk before other than to say he ignores Funk.... hmmmm.
In fact I just went over to Oklahoma Lefty's and searched "Okie Funk" there are about a half dozen posts on the Funkster, all agreeing with Funk with the exception of one very mild disagreement.
So... I'm not really all that confident that dave could be all that objective or even spot Funk's indoctrination considering he agrees with Funk far more than he disagrees... at least by blogging posts.
sorry dave... but the facts are the facts on that.
Half dozen posts agreeing with Okie Funk and zero refuting or disputing Okie Funk... another example of non-partisanship?
In dave's defense he probably doesn't read very many of doc hoc's posts and doesn't bother to post on any of the ones he disagrees with due to time constraints and in the interest of non-partisanship, fairness and balanced blogging much the way I don't post any of Rush Limbaugh's articles that I don't agree with or challenge any of his so-called outrageous statements... But that doesn't mean I support Rush Limbaugh... does it?
well i would like to think that if he said something outrageous enough that you really disliked you would probably comment on it.
Sweet gravy.
Red said -- "In dave's defense he probably doesn't read very many of doc hoc's posts..."
That is 100% correct. I don't read Okie Funk unless there is a headline that really peaks my interest. Most of the time I find him amazingly boring and thus I just ignore him (no offense to the guy or anything…I just have no time for blogs that go on and on about the same crap day in and day out, especially when they sound like they are just reciting the talking points of their side).
As far as going to UCO, yes I have gone, and will be attending again this fall, to UCO. I have never taken any of Doc Hoc's classes so I know NOTHING about what he is like in class or as a person. I did take a class called Victims in the Media and the professor drove me crazy because he was a walking stereotype. He was a nice guy and all but he fit the mold of all of the things that people on the right hate about college professors. Needless to say I gave him a lot of crap.
There are a lot of assumptions about Doc Hoc as a person based solely on what one can find online. What someone puts up on a blog is only part of who they are. There is no way for someone, who actually has a life, to articulate EVERYTHING that he/she believes in online. Unfortunately people make assumptions (like the ones that Red has made about me supporting Doc Hoc) based on what they have read and that is just not the full picture.
Okay Red…you can tell me why I am wrong, misguided, and an idiot now. Either that or you will tell me that I think everyone should be like me or some other nonsense. I guess that’s what I get for trying to engage in the conversation though. *sigh*
dave... all i did was search your blog for "okie funk" i found a half dozen posts of yours praising Okie Funk/doc hoc posts and opinions... but none disagreeing, refuting or disputing any of his weekly outrageous radical leftwing rants... which are far beyond "talking points". You do have a link to his blog though none of us comment regularly on all our linked sites of course.
I just find it interesting that you DON'T find Kurt Hochenauer (doc hoc) interesting... even though you link to his site and quote his pieces favorably... you distance yourself and disapprove when asked... almost all of us (except for kittenstomper) agree that doc hoc is a radical leftwing extremist... who teaches blogging at a fairly sizeable state university by example.
His posts portray Oklahoma as an embarrassment and conservative Christians as the source of all embarrassment. In his world, Oklahoma has been under rightwing Republican oppression since statehood when the opposite is true and his posts are anti-business, anti-American and anti-sanity.
That is not only interesting, but a big problem to most people I talk to... but not you.
Strangely enough, it dawned on me that I actually had a class with Doc Hoc in English composition back when I was going to Rose State College in Midwest City. I think he was a temporary replacement for the teacher we were supposed to have but he ended up teaching the entire semester.
The only thing I remember about his class is that on all of my research papers and all of my tests my scores were consistently As. However, due to the fact that I did not attend his class very often (I myself remember finding him boring) he gave me a C for the semester. Based solely on attendance.
YOU WENT TO ROSE!
I also went to Oscar Rose...71 and 72, on a baseball scholarship, I think that was the second year it was open for business.
100 points if you know what the team name was BEFORE it was the Raiders?
Hint: they let the student body vote and decide it... duh, bad move.
Just say the first thing that pops into your head and fill in the blank when I say... "Rose blanks"
A: Raiders
B: Warriors
C: Bombers
D: Buds
Yup, you got it... The Rose Buds. I still have a jersey.
Former big league catcher Mike Brumley was the coach.
I could write a book on that experience I tell ya'...
Yeah I went to Rose State for a little while...a few semesters.
In fact, I was on the Student Senate while I was going there. Even served as Vice President for a short time.
Well I don't have to ask why you didn't pursue a career in politics then... a small dose of it that early oughta do ya for life.
You know my motto... no good deed goes unpunished.
You went Oscar Meyer in the early to mid 90's then?
And Kurt taught at Rose... wow, it's a small world after all.
Yes, early 90s.
I took his class I want to say spring 1991 and i think that is the only semester he taught there.
Red –
Of the 1,885 posts that I have done at Oklahoma Lefty you found 6 in which I posted specifically about something in reference to Okie Funk. Let me do that math… 0.003183023872679045% of my posts have something to do with Doc Hoc. Wow. That is staggering. I am obviously in with the Funkster lock, step, and barrel. You’ve got me.
In response to the “I just find it interesting that you DON'T find Kurt Hochenauer (doc hoc) interesting...” paragraph, I’d like to point out that I link to TONS of sites, many of which I disagree with regularly (yours is one on the right and Okie Funk is one on the left). Who cares? Just because I have a link to some site doesn’t mean that I agree with everything said site posts. If it did, then I probably wouldn’t have any links on my blog. As far as the good doctor’s extremism goes, sure he comes off that way on his blog, but so do you Red. Sorry but it’s the truth. I have posted comments on his site before disagreeing with him (his post on Michael Bloomberg from sometime last year comes to mind), but not very often because as you stated I just don’t have the time or the energy to bother. I post on your site, not because I think you are any less extreme than Doc Hoc (no offense), but because I like you (even though you drive me crazy half the time).
Dave... if you searched my blog and found a half dozen posts where I agreed with ohhh let's say the KKK's David Duke and zero posts disagreeing or refuting or condemning him, what would YOU think?
Well Duke was a Republican. :-P
In all seriousness Red, have you even been reading my responses because you keep repeating yourself in some form or another. Since you have taken (or was it wasted) the time to thoroughly search my blog for all references to Okie Funk, then you probably found the time that I told Danny that I did not agree with him very often. Again though, I submit that 6 out of 1800 is insignificant. Are there specific issues that I agree with him on? Sure. Does that make me a lunatic leftist? Not to anyone with any ounce of sanity. Are there specific issues that you agree with David Duke on? I’m sure that there are. Does that make you a raving racist? Again, not to anyone with an ounce of sanity. You are making dramatic leaps to wild conclusions and honestly Red they make no sense.
This is pointless though because no matter what I say or how reasoned, logical, or reasonable I make my argument you are probably going to come back with the same response over and over. So I’m going to save you the time Red. You’ve won. I submit to your blogging and debating superiority. Is that better?
LOL... dude, don't blame me if you choose to overlook everything you disagree with doc hoc on and only post on what you agree with him on or that you don't see his radical leftwing Democrat(ic) bias as a problem considering he teaches a course on blogging by using his blog as an example of fair and rational.
Hey... I might overlook some things I disagree with Limbaugh and Coulter on... difference is, they aren't college professors or Oklahoma bloggers are they?
I like you dave, but I gotta call you out on this hypocrisy stuff... I've heard you repeat how bad for America you think the likes of Limbaugh and Coulter are... but are silent on Funk and the like.
That's all I'm sayin' man, I think you are more partisan than you think you are.
Not that that's a bad thing.
-red
Just for you I did a post on Okie Funk. I’m sure you will see it as fuel for your silly fire. As far as I’m concerned you, Okie Funk, Coulter, Olberman, Hannity, and the like are all the same. You’re a bunch of extremist polemics that do nothing more than tell everyone why the other side is wrong. You are all blinded by your partisan beliefs and refuse to see the validity in the opinions of others. You are all hypocrites and at times make me sick.
I like you too Red but this discussion is pointless. Yes I have contradictions and an a hypocrite at times, but we all are…it’s part of being human. I can at least admit it. I’m sorry that I have failed to express myself in a way that you can understand. I’ve done my best and have failed.
Post a Comment
<< Home