The Democrat Smear and Lie of the Day!

Need more examples of how the left would rather SMEAR than debate? There is an example nearly every single day now...

Take the current SCHIP issue and President Bush's veto of that bill.

Here is the official disgusting Democrat email I received from Yee-haa Dean essentially calling Bush a warmongering child-hater and asking ME to tell the Democrat led Congress what to do.

"Dear Red,

Yesterday, Governor Dean emailed you asking you to tell Congress to stand up to President Bush and override his veto of the State Children's Health Insurance Program.

George Bush vetoed health care for sick kids -- and he did it while he continues to pour money into the war in Iraq...some of it going to companies like Halliburton and Blackwater.

Fortunately, this disgusting act of political calculation can be overturned"

Thanks for all that you do,
Tom McMahon Executive Director of the Democrat Party on behalf of Howard Dean Spokesman for the Democrat Party.

Why is Howard Dean emailing average citizens to tell Congress what to do? (He's pandering to his base)

Congress is controlled by a Democrat majority and Howard Dean is the "leader" of the Democrat party... why doesn't Howard just tell "his" own Congress what to do? I'm pretty sure he has Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid on speed-dial.

Why? Because Democrats voted against the bill too! Dean doesn't even have the support of Democrats... so how hypocritical is it to blame Bush?

It's "Typicritical".

Here (below) are just some of the facts that Democrats are hiding from you while smearing anyone who dares disagree with their, "it's for the poor sick children", lie.
(Thanks to Right Truth)

"...There has been a lot of interest in Tennessee regarding the reauthorization of the State Children's Health Insurance Plan (SCHIP) which appeared before Congress last week and was vetoed by President Bush yesterday. I'd like to highlight some of the critical shortcomings that prompted the entire Tennessee House Republican delegation, a strong majority of our GOP colleagues, and several Democrat members to oppose its passage.

First, we share the common goal of expanding access to quality healthcare to all Americans, especially disadvantaged children. But this bill will not advance those efforts. According to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, by expanding the definition of "poor" to include those making $82,000 per year or more, will enroll an additional 1.2 million people by 2012. Of those 1.2 million, CBO estimates that 600,000 of them have private health insurance coverage today. This bill would provide strong incentive for individuals and employers to dump private coverage and shift these costs to the taxpayers -- at an estimated cost of $74,000 per person annually. Here in Tennessee we watched a similar stampede to state-run coverage cripple the TennCare system. Another troubling component of the bill is the removal of the proof-of-citizenship requirements for enrollment. This provision, found in Section 211 (H.R. 976), is commonly referenced as the concerted effort to allow taxpayer subsidized healthcare to illegal immigrants.

The SCHIP bill also employs questionable budgeting pratices. It dramatically increases Federal funding to enroll new children in SCHIP for the next 5 years -- funding which is partially offset by a tax increase. Then in 2012 the bill abruptly cuts total SCHIP funding by 80 percent – to a level substantially lower than what we're paying now with far fewer people enrolled. The effect is that unless Congress intervenes, millions of children will then lose coverage. CBO estimates that by 2017, the program will have a $40 billion hole in it.

Yes, there are even more problems with the passage of this socialized medicine for illegals bill.. but the above alone is reason to understand that Democrats have no clue, are promoting socialized medicine and are for open borders... and their only defense for the indefensible is to "SMEAR" Bush (as usual).

The hight of this idiocy is that proponents claim it's not a tax increase but plan to fund the program from the sales of a product they are at the same time OUTLAWING. Charge too much tax on tobacco and tobacco sales go down... make it illegal to smoke and sales go down, so where will this socialized medicine funding come from? YOU in the form of a tax increase as soon as the budget isn't met (first year). It's a lie people.

Of course the Soros/Clinton News Service (main stream media) is portraying this as "Bush hates sick children".... pathetic liars.

Here in Oklahoma, all of the mediamatters/moveon.org clone blogs like Okie Funk, Oklahoma Blue, Sooner Thought, Kittenstomper and the rest are URGING... excuse me DEMANDING that Oklahoman's tell Inhofe to not hate Oklahoma children.
Whenever you hear Democrats saying "It's for the children", grab your wallet and run for the hills.

-red s tater